90
——
О 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Coincidence factor Γ
Figure 3.8: Coincidence factors Γ show spike capturing accuracy for seven different cells
using various sizes of reduced systems (fc = kυ — kf) and Algorithm 3 (see (h)). The strongly
excitable channel models are used here (see Table 3.7 for the model used on each cell). From
top to bottom the cells are: (a) projection interneuron AR-l-20-04-A (Martinez), (b) CA3
hippocampal interneuron 951005a (Chitwood et al., 1999), (с) САЗ hippocampal pyramidal
cell 12299402 (Chitwood et al., 1999), (d) CAl hippocampal interneuron 100103a from
the stratum oriens (Golding et al., 2001) (Golding et al., 2005), (e) retinal ganglion cell
mp_tb_40984_gcl (Toris et al., 1995), (f) hippocampal cell 512882 from the dentate gyrus
(Rihn and Claiborne, 1990), and (g) pyramidal cell P8-DEV66 from the cerebral cortex
(Furtak et al., 2007). Scale bars on all cells represent 100 μm.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Tax systems and tax reforms in Europe: Rationale and open issue for more radical reforms
3. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
4. The name is absent
5. A Brief Introduction to the Guidance Theory of Representation
6. The name is absent
7. THE DIGITAL DIVIDE: COMPUTER USE, BASIC SKILLS AND EMPLOYMENT
8. Dual Inflation Under the Currency Board: The Challenges of Bulgarian EU Accession
9. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
10. Firm Creation, Firm Evolution and Clusters in Chile’s Dynamic Wine Sector: Evidence from the Colchagua and Casablanca Regions