25
ε is small, then the perturbed voltage and gating variables are assumed to be
vb = vb + εvb + C,(ε2)
(2.28)
wbcf = wbcf + εwbcf + O(ε2).
(2.29)
Note here that the rest values vb and wbcf are now spatially-varying. Substituting
(2.28) into (2.17), we construct a linearized model by solving for the perturbation
terms vb, wbcf of order ε. After substitution we find
Qcf
c=l
∕=ι
I 5b _ _
- (gbs + εgbs{t)')δ(x - xbs)(yb + εvb - Ebs)
(2.30)
ε¾w6c∕(t) =
wcf,∞(υb + ε⅞) - (wbcf + εwbcf)
τcf (υb + εvb)
(2.31)
The initial conditions are now
vf,(τ,0) = w6c∕(τ,0) = 0
while boundary conditions, because they are already linear, remain the same as in
(2.19), (2.20), (2.24). The soma conditions contain nonlinear terms, but they may be
linearized in the same manner as shown here.
More intriguing information
1. Spatial Aggregation and Weather Risk Management2. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts
3. Yield curve analysis
4. The name is absent
5. EFFICIENCY LOSS AND TRADABLE PERMITS
6. L'organisation en réseau comme forme « indéterminée »
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources