The name is absent



Chapter 4

kaolinite at the bottom. The third and fourth bottles are the samples with 100 ppm
sodium naphthenate adding 0.6 mM NaOH (24 ppm) or 0.3 mM Na2SiO3 (37 ppm),
respectively. These two samples have similar separation results to the second
sample. Comparing the first sample and other samples, adding naphthenate
changes the wettability of kaolinite to more oil-wet. In the last three samples,
some of the kaolinite becomes partially oil-wet and stays in the upper oil-in-water
emulsion layer.

! A                             ‘4                                                                                                            ;

No Naphthenate With Naphthenate 0.6 mM NaOH 0.3 mM Na2SiO3
pH 8.3                 8.3               9.0                9.0

Figure 4.2 Separation of toluene-brine mixture with 1.0 % kaolinite

Figure 4.3 shows water-wet fraction of kaolinite in the samples with 1.0 w.%
kaolinite in toluene-brine mixture (1:1, v∕v). The first bar is water-wet fraction (96%)
in the sample without sodium naphthenate at pH 8.3. Almost all the kaolinite is
water-wet in absence of naphthenate.

The second bar is water-wet fraction (18%) in the sample with 100 ppm
sodium naphthenate at pH 8.3. In this case, water-wet fraction is much Iowerwith
the presence of naphthenate. This indicates naphthenate can change the

92



More intriguing information

1. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation
2. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
3. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren
8. The name is absent
9. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
10. The name is absent