93
0.12
0.10
0.08
ω
го
СО 0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.035
0.030
0.025
φ0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
Simulation true success rates
Figure 4.1: Comparison of the estimated success rates under the four models under
SO. The horizontal axis shows the n = 12 success rates under the simulation truth
S0. The upper panel shows the absolute bias. The lower panel shows mean squared
error. Both are arranged by true pi. The five lines and labels correspond to the
models NEPPM with 7 = 1 [1], NEPPM with 7 = 1/2 [2], parametric Hierarchical
[3], HLRM [4] and separate [5] models.
More intriguing information
1. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities2. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices
3. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
4. Yield curve analysis
5. The name is absent
6. Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model
7. A simple enquiry on heterogeneous lending rates and lending behaviour
8. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
9. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
10. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -