93
0.12
0.10
0.08
ω
го
СО 0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.035
0.030
0.025
φ0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
Simulation true success rates
Figure 4.1: Comparison of the estimated success rates under the four models under
SO. The horizontal axis shows the n = 12 success rates under the simulation truth
S0. The upper panel shows the absolute bias. The lower panel shows mean squared
error. Both are arranged by true pi. The five lines and labels correspond to the
models NEPPM with 7 = 1 [1], NEPPM with 7 = 1/2 [2], parametric Hierarchical
[3], HLRM [4] and separate [5] models.
More intriguing information
1. A MARKOVIAN APPROXIMATED SOLUTION TO A PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PROBLEM2. The name is absent
3. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Development in the United States
4. CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING AS INFORMATIONAL SYSTEM AND ASSISTANCE OF DECISION
5. The name is absent
6. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
7. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results
8. The name is absent
9. The Shepherd Sinfonia
10. A Hybrid Neural Network and Virtual Reality System for Spatial Language Processing