96

Figure 4.3: Scenarios Sl through S4. Panels (a) through (d) summarize simulation
under scenarios Sl through S4. Comparison of the estimated success rates under
the NEPPM (star “*”) vs. the HLRM (circle “o”). The horizontal axis shows the
n = 12 true success rates under the assumed scenario. The upper, medium and lower
panels show absolute value of the bias, mean square error and coverage probability of
the central 95% credible interval, respectively. All are arranged by subtype. Under
Sl (panel (a)), from left to right, the first three success rates correspond to poor
prognosis {xl — —1), the following six to intermediate (rrj = 0) and the last three to
good prognosis (xi = 1). The point sizes are proportional to the sample size Nl.
More intriguing information
1. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Une nouvelle vision de l'économie (The knowledge society: a new approach of the economy)
5. The name is absent
6. American trade policy towards Sub Saharan Africa –- a meta analysis of AGOA
7. Happiness in Eastern Europe
8. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
9. The name is absent
10. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3