The name is absent



50

(a) Given the previous values for θ*, K and φ, we generate a new configuration by
sampling new values for the indicator variables using (3.21), replacing
θ↑,θ⅛,....
When sampling φi = 0 we associate the observation i, xi, with a new draw from
gi0 given in (3.20) and update the configuration accordingly.

Note that using a base measure G0 conjugate to fi is mathematically convenient.
It makes sampling from
gi0 and computation of hi easier. For computational reasons
conjugate families should be considered when appropriate. In the model introduced
in Section 3.4 this is the case.

Repeated use of step (a) defines a Markov chain with limiting distribution equal
to the posterior distribution
p(θ*,K,φ ∣ rrn). But, this Markov chain mixes poorly.
Since it shifts one value of
θi at a time, rarely does a value of in a clusters change.
This change needs the chain to pass trough a middle state of low probability in which
all indices in the cluster
Sk are moved to other clusters. Convergence is accelerated
by avoiding this phenomenon. Once the values of
θ*, K and φ have been obtained in
step (a), the vector
θ* is resampled conditional on the values of K and φ. That is, a
second step is added to the Gibbs sampling scheme (after each step (a)),

(b) Given K and φ, we draw a new set of parameters Θ* by sampling new values
from the posterior distribution (3.14) .

Sequential iterations over (a) and (b) defines a Markov chain that converges to
the posterior distribution
p(β*,K,φ xn). For details about this convergence see
MacEachern and Müller (1998) . The posterior distribution of any function of the
parameters can be estimated based on the posterior sample. For example the aver-
age of (3.17), with respect to the simulated values of flɪ,...,
θ*κ, and θn+1 estimates
the predictive distribution
p(xn ∣ ʃ") = G. This average is used for the density
estimation. See the example given in the next subsection.

Now we extend the Gibbs sampling scheme to include the common parameter
σ. Let p(σ) denote the prior for σ. We draw this parameter from the appropriate



More intriguing information

1. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
2. Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Conservation and Free-Ridership on Subsidization – Evidence from Germany
3. GOVERNANÇA E MECANISMOS DE CONTROLE SOCIAL EM REDES ORGANIZACIONAIS
4. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence
5. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
6. The name is absent
7. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
8. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent