The name is absent



AFM TIP


D = 11 nm


AFM TIP


LIPID BILAYER


LlPlD BILAYER


Surface electrostatics
relatively unaffected by
AFM tip

AFM tip is close
enough to perturb the
surface

Figure 3.4: (Left) The finite element model is solved with a constant charge density
boundary condition from
D = 40 nm to D = 11 nm as in Chapter 2. Note that these values
of
D are for the data shown in Figure 3.2. For other data sets, the D values will be
different. For
D = 11 nm and less, we vary the lipids surface charge density according to
the law governing the phenomenon being addressed (i.e. whether it is counterion binding
or mobile lipid charge regulation).

Figure 3.5: Do is chosen as the point where the AFM data starts deviating significantly
from the electrostatic simulation of Chapter 2. For the above sample,
Dq = 11 nm. The
AFM data and the electrostatic simulation shown here is the same as in Figure 3.2.


32




More intriguing information

1. Modelling Transport in an Interregional General Equilibrium Model with Externalities
2. The name is absent
3. Cardiac Arrhythmia and Geomagnetic Activity
4. The name is absent
5. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
6. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
7. The name is absent
8. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
9. The name is absent
10. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?