Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping



adjustment for the less
able pupils

Set school

7.1 (43)

43.6 (265)

28.9 (176)

16.3 (99)

3.3 (20)

x2= 33.18, df = 8,
p = .0001

Total

10.6 (172)

44.6 (722)

26.1 (422)

15 (243)

2.7 (44)

Mixed ability grouping

MA school

18.6 (94)

44.3 (224)

22.5 (114)

11.7 (59)

1.2 (6)

leads to better social
adjustment of all pupils

PS school

7.9 (40)

41.6 (210)

27.9 (141)

18 (91)

2.8 (14)

Set school

5.8 (35)

41.3 (251)

32.4 (197)

17.8 (108)

1.6 (10)

x2= 70.98, df = 8,
p = .0001

Total

10.4 (169)

42.3 (685)

27.9 (452)

15.9 (258)

1.9 (30)

Overall motivation is

MA school

8.7 (44)

28.9 (146)

29.6 (150)

26.9 (136)

5.3 (27)

higher when pupils are
in mixed ability

PS school

4.2 (21)

15.8 (80)

34.7 (175)

33.9 (171)

9.7 (49)

classes.

Set school

3.3 (20)

18.8 (114)

31.9 (194)

36.3 (221)

8.9 (54)

x2= 57.58, df = 8,
p = .0001

Total

5.3 (85)

21 (340)

32.1 (519)

32.6 (528)

8(130)

Knowing they are in a

MA school

12.3 (62)

34.2 (173)

17.8 (90)

29.2 (148)

5.5 (28)

low set leads to pupils
giving up.

PS school

7.1 (36)

28.5 (144)

16.8 (85)

39.4 (199)

6.5 (33)

Set school

6.9 (42)

31.1 (189)

17.1 (104)

38.2 (232)

5.8 (35)

x2= 23.41, df = 8,
p = .003

Total

8.6 (140)

31.3 (506)

17.2 (279)

35.8 (579)

5.9 (96)

27



More intriguing information

1. Are Public Investment Efficient in Creating Capital Stocks in Developing Countries?
2. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
3. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
7. Dementia Care Mapping and Patient-Centred Care in Australian residential homes: An economic evaluation of the CARE Study, CHERE Working Paper 2008/4
8. Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in Models with Endogenous Fertility
9. Locke's theory of perception
10. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM