Table 3: Subject teachers’ beliefs about the effects of ability grouping on able
pupils, personal and social educational outcomes, equal opportunities and
behaviour
Statements_____________________________________________ |
Art |
Music |
Drama |
PE |
Sig |
Able pupils_________________________________________ | |||||
Bright children are neglected or held back in mixed ability |
1.82 (1.29) |
2.14 |
2.03 |
2.14 (1.1) |
"Ns |
Setting ensures that brighter children make maximum |
2.53 |
2.72 |
2.39 (1.25) |
2.93 |
.008 |
Setting prevents brighter children being inhibited by |
2.5 |
2.58 |
2.12 (1.1) |
2.48 |
^^NS |
Statements_____________________________________________ |
Art |
Music |
Drama |
PE |
Sig |
Personal and social educational outcomes_____________ | |||||
Setting has a damaging effect on the self-esteem of those |
2.56 |
2.41 |
(1.19) |
2.15 |
.027 |
Setting children stigmatises those perceived as less able |
2.51 |
2.79 |
2.58 (1.3) |
2.31 |
^^NS |
Less able children compare themselves unfavourably to |
2 |
2.21 |
1.88 |
2.21 |
"ns |
Mixed ability grouping leads to better social adjustment |
2.74 |
2.58 |
2.91 |
2.43 |
.024 |
Mixed ability grouping leads to better social adjustment |
2.76 |
2.55 |
2.73 (1.1) |
2.2 |
.0001 |
Overall, motivation is higher when pupils are in mixed |
2.01 |
2 |
2.27 |
1.67 |
.006 |
Knowing they are in a low set leads to pupils giving up |
2.44 |
2.22 |
2.67 |
1.76 |
.0001 |
Statements_____________________________________________ |
Art |
Music |
Drama |
PE |
~Sig~~ |
Equal opportunities_________________________________ | |||||
Setting benefits the more able pupils at the expense of the |
1.84 (1.24) |
1.71 (1.11) |
2.03 (1.24) |
1.32 |
.005 |
Mixed ability grouping gives each child a fair chance |
2.07 |
1.86 |
2 |
1.67 |
^^NS |
Mixed ability classes provide the less able pupils with |
2.73 |
2.58 |
2.81 |
2.73 |
.007 |
Statements_____________________________________________ |
Art |
Music |
Drama |
PE |
Sig |
Behaviour______________________________________ | |||||
In general there are more discipline problems in mixed |
1.67 (1.37) |
1.79 (1.14) |
1.61 (1.12) |
2.09 |
^^NS |
Where classes are set there are more discipline problems |
2.63 (1.11) |
2.54 (1.14) |
2.76 |
2.27 1.19) |
"ns |
Attendance and exclusion__________________________ |
Art |
Music |
Drama |
PE | |
Where classes are set there is more truancy from pupils in |
2.05 |
2.06 |
2 |
1.71 (.97) |
.036 |
Where classes are set there are more exclusions of pupils |
2.08 |
2.18 |
2.27 |
1.91 |
^^NS |
* Figures in brackets are standard deviations
24
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Feature type effects in semantic memory: An event related potentials study
3. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
4. ISSUES IN NONMARKET VALUATION AND POLICY APPLICATION: A RETROSPECTIVE GLANCE
5. The name is absent
6. Fortschritte bei der Exportorientierung von Dienstleistungsunternehmen
7. Peer Reviewed, Open Access, Free
8. The name is absent
9. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
10. The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning