Ability grouping in the secondary school: attitudes of teachers of practically based subjects



Table 4: Subject teachers’ beliefs about the effects of different grouping
structures on teaching

Statements__________________________

Art_____

Music

Drama

PE

Sig

Setting leads to teachers ignoring the fact
that a class always contains a range of
abilities__________________________________________

1.81
(1.04)

1.79
(1.0)

2
(1.06)

1.51
(.97)

.039

Only very good teachers can teach mixed
ability classes successfully

1.87

(1.12)

1.83
(.91)

1.64

(1.19)

1.83

(1.2)

^ns

Teaching is easier for the teacher when
classes are set

2.26
(.99)

2.36
(.98)

2.06
(1.06)

2.54
(.98)

^ns

In mixed ability classes teachers tend to
teach to the average child

1.86

(1.16)

1.93
(.91)

1.82
(.95)

2.2
(.93)

^ns

Setting makes classroom management
easier

2.31
(1.0)

2.44
(.91)

2.33
(1.05)

2.67
(.89)

^ns

Setting enables pupils’ curriculum needs
to be better matched

2.41
(1.02)

2.67
(.97)

2.03
(1.05)

2.87
(.67)

.0001

* Figures in brackets are standard deviations

25



More intriguing information

1. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
2. The name is absent
3. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
4. On the job rotation problem
5. The name is absent
6. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
7. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
8. Antidote Stocking at Hospitals in North Palestine
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent