APPENDIX C
Table C.1: Johansen’s Cointegration Rank Test Statistics for AI system applied to subsamples of
Italian survey data
Gender |
Education |
Income | |||||||||||
Male |
Female |
High |
Low |
Above pov. |
thresh. |
Below |
pov. thresh. |
95% critical values | |||||
H0 |
LR |
LR |
LR |
LR |
LR |
LR |
λ trace | ||||||
r=0 |
157.80 |
[0.000] |
136.02 |
[0.000] |
162.69 |
[0.000] |
132.75 |
[0.000] |
136.50 |
[0.000] |
126.97 |
[0.000] |
103.68 |
r=1 |
90.89 |
[0.002] |
75.98 |
[0.058] |
106.86 |
[0.000] |
77.64 |
[0.043] |
76.37 |
[0.050] |
76.20 |
[0.058] |
76.81 |
r=2 |
39.74 |
[0.488] |
41.84 |
[0.386] |
56.88 |
[0.026] |
50.76 |
[0.095] |
49.22 |
[0.126] |
46.74 |
[0.193] |
53.94 |
r=3 |
19.40 |
[0.761] |
21.48 |
[0.633] |
27.62 |
[0.262] |
25.72 |
[0.362] |
27.42 |
[0.279] |
21.91 |
[0.604] |
35.07 |
r=4 |
9.95 |
[0.649] |
9.77 |
[0.667] |
11.56 |
[0.497] |
9.59 |
[0.683] |
9.08 |
[0.730] |
11.61 |
[0.492] |
20.16 |
r=5 |
3.44 |
[0.512] |
3.68 |
[0.473] |
2.27 |
[0.724] |
3.86 |
[0.445] |
3.81 |
[0.453] |
4.21 |
[0.394] |
9.14 |
Age
<35 |
35-49 |
50-65 |
>65 |
95% critical values | |
H0 |
LR |
LR |
LR |
LR |
λ trace |
r=0 |
127.01 [0.000] |
134.93 [0.000] |
167.21 [0.000] |
131.27 [0.000] |
103.68 |
r=1 |
80.33 [0.025] |
81.26 [0.021] |
79.98 [0.027] |
79.82 [0.028] |
76.81 |
r=2 |
45.46 [0.236] |
49.86 [0.112] |
51.58 [0.081] |
45.43 [0.237] |
53.94 |
r=3 |
19.85 [0.735] |
27.57 [0.264] |
30.17 [0.158] |
23.84 [0.477] |
35.07 |
r=4 |
8.21 [0.802] |
12.42 [0.420] |
10.16 [0.629] |
9.94 [0.650] |
20.16 |
r=5 |
2.62 [0.659] |
5.05 [0.288] |
3.51 [0.500] |
3.86 [0.444] |
9.14 |
Notes: r is number of cointegrating relations. We report Johansen trace tests for evaluating the identification condition
of AI model. These values are estimated by optimal length lags with restricted intercepts and no trends in six endogenous
variables w1 , w2 , logp1 , logp2 , logp3 and log(Y /p). Seasonal centred dummies are included. P-values of tests are shown
in square brackets.
33
More intriguing information
1. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program2. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
3. The name is absent
4. The Integration Order of Vector Autoregressive Processes
5. The name is absent
6. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
7. The name is absent
8. Imitation in location choice
9. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS
10. How much do Educational Outcomes Matter in OECD Countries?