Federal Tax-Transfer Policy and Intergovernmental Pre-Commitment



For case (iii) and (iv) τti < 0 and siti 0. Thus, Lemma 1 predicts td > tN . In case (iv),
τti < 0 and siti = 0 and consequently td > tN . In case (i), (ii), and (v), the transfer and labor
tax response are opposite in sign. Lemma 2 provides a condition which allows us to sign the
net-effect in these three cases.

Lemma 2: In case (i), (ii), and (v), condition (27) is equivalent to the condition

1    <>

β(t(tikβ + ki - tjkji)+ αJ = >0 ≠- tdl = \tN.                  (28)

2                      I >I <

Proof: Substituting Eqs. (16) and (18) into condition (27) yields

i b00 ( дг ) b00 ( gj ) tj kji + b00 ( дг ) b00 ( gj )( ti + ki )    < i β ( tiktii + ki ) + '>

-l----------------И---------------- S  b (g )------И------.

Multiplying by -|A| > 0 gives

li (b00(gi)b00(gj)tjkji + b00(gi)b00(gj)(ti + ki)´    S    b0(gi) β(tik*i + ki) + α.      (29)

Using the fact that in equilibrium b0(gi) = ^+1^ (see Eq. (11)) and rearranging condition (29)
leads to

2 β ( tikii + ki + tj kji ) S β ( tikiti + ki ) + α

(30)


with β > 0 as given by Eq. (20). Since in case (i), (ii), and (v), β(tiktii + ki) + α > 0, inequality
(30) can be rewritten to

0 S   2 β ( tiktii + ki — tj kji ) + α.

Note, the inequality is equivalent to

-liτti     S     b0(gi)siti

28



More intriguing information

1. Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation
2. Stable Distributions
3. The name is absent
4. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke
5. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development
9. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
10. Peer Reviewed, Open Access, Free