Capital publico y crecimiento econômico en Espana 1980-2004
53
Otto, G. y Voss, G. (1996), “Public capital and private sector productivity”, The Economic Record, 70:
121-132.
Pestieau, P. (1974), “Optimal taxation and discount rate for public investment in a growth setting”,
Journal of Public Economics, 3: 217-235.
Ratner, J. (1983), “Government capital and the production function for U.S. private output”, Econo-
mics Letters, 13: 213-217.
Romp, W. y de Haan, J. (2007), “Public capital and economic growth: A critical survey”, Perspektien
der Wirtschaftspolitik, 8 (Special Issue): 6-52.
Sturm, J. E.; Kuper, G. H. y de Haan, J. (1997), “Modelling government investment and economic
growth on a macro level: a review”, en Brakman, S. and van Ees, H. (Eds.) Market Behaviour and
Macroeconomic Modelling, MacMillan, London.
Tatom, J. (1991), “Public capital and private sector performance”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Review, 73: 3-15.
Voss, G. (2002), “Public and private investment in the United States and Canada”, Economic Mode-
lling, 19: 641-664.
Weitzman, M. (1970), “Optimal growth with scale economies in the creation of overhead capital”, Re-
view of Economic Studies, 37: 556-570.
Abstract
This paper analyses the contribution of public capital stock to output and productivity growth in Spain.
We use a simple growth general equilibrium model in which public capital stock is included as an ad-
ditional input to private factors. Calibration of the model to the Spanish economy for the period 1980-
2004 shows that the output elasticity of public capital is 0.068. For the period 1980-2004 we find that
the average contribution of public capital to output growth was of 0.35 percentage points, of an output
growth of 2.8% per year. This implies that about 13% of all output growth was due to public capital.
Key words: Public capital, growth decomposition, productivity, general equilibrium.
JEL classification: E22, O30, O40.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Palkkaneuvottelut ja työmarkkinat Pohjoismaissa ja Euroopassa
4. Has Competition in the Japanese Banking Sector Improved?
5. The name is absent
6. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development
7. Examining Variations of Prominent Features in Genre Classification
8. The name is absent
9. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
10. Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary