Migrating Football Players, Transfer Fees and Migration Controls



the social optimum would be between 0.32 and 0.44. For such a rate in the market,
however, the big league would not demand any talent from the small league at all as is
shown in the right-hand panels of Table 6. For both leagues 1 and 2 the closed-economy
case will result, which is advantageous to the small league compared to the case with no
training facilities. For league 2 the social welfare optimum would imply higher welfare,
however.

4.2.3 A home-grown players rule

As mentioned in the introduction an alternative way to regulate the mobility of players is
by introducing a ‘nationality’ rule or a ‘home-grown’ rule. The former rule has been
deemed conflicting with European laws as it imposes an impediment to the free
movement of persons. The latter rule, however, as it is now applied in European Football
is not based on nationality and thus will probably not be interpreted as an infringement on
European law. The purpose of this subsection is to consider the effectiveness of this rule
in reaching the social-welfare solution and to compare it to a system of transfer fees,
considered previously.

In our model, the home-grown rule will only be effective for league 1 as league 2 has no
other option but to employ home-grown talents, or no talents at all. Indicate the total
number of talented players in league 1 by
T1 = T1 + T21, where as before T1 is the
number of home-grown talents and
T21 is the number of talents transferred from the
small league. A home-grown rule prescribes that
T1 should at least be a proportion, say
λ, of the total number of talents playing in league 1. League 1 can decide to train more
talents than prescribed. This is indicated by the parameter
μ, so that the total number of
home-grown talents playing in the big league equals
T = (λ + μ)T1, where μ0. It
follows that the relationship between home-grown and imported talents can be written as
T1 = εT21, where ε = (λ + μ)^1 - λ - μ) With these definitions, and assuming no
transfer fee system, profits for league 1 can be written as:

Π1 =N1σα(1+ε)T21(1-α(1+ε)T21))-c(e1-1)                           (17)

21



More intriguing information

1. On the Relation between Robust and Bayesian Decision Making
2. The name is absent
3. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide
4. The name is absent
5. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System
6. PROFITABILITY OF ALFALFA HAY STORAGE USING PROBABILITIES: AN EXTENSION APPROACH
7. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
8. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE
9. Une Classe de Concepts
10. Apprenticeships in the UK: from the industrial-relation via market-led and social inclusion models
11. Benefits of travel time savings for freight transportation : beyond the costs
12. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics
13. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
14. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
15. The name is absent
16. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
17. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
18. LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
19. On the estimation of hospital cost: the approach
20. The name is absent