Pass-through of external shocks along the pricing chain: A panel estimation approach for the euro area



Regarding the impact of a 1% increase in energy commodity prices (see Chart 6), except for
the direct effect on PPI energy, the effect is rather muted. According to the result, the impact
amounts to an increase by 0.27% on PPI energy after 4 quarters, by 0.022% in PPI
intermediate and 0.008% in PPI consumer goods. Regarding the impact on consumer prices,
the impact is rather similar for non-energy industrial goods and services prices (around
0.005% after 16 quarters), while it is stronger for processed food prices (about 0.012%) , with
an overall slower pass-through compared to producer prices. Using the weighted average for
the CPEX suggests an impact of 0.006%. It should be noted that the present study only looks
into the indirect effect on the non-volatile components of the HICP, while the direct effect on
the HICP energy would be significantly stronger and more immediate. A rule of thumb would
suggest that a 1% increase in oil prices would lead to a 0.01-0.02% increase in total HICP due
to the direct effect of oil prices.11 A somewhat astonishing fact is that the effect on processed
food prices is about twice as large as that on the other consumer prices which is due to a
stronger impact of PPI energy and intermediate goods on this component of the HICP. This
may reflect the relatively high energy content in food production.

Chart 6 Impact multiplier of energy commodity prices

(deviation from baseline following 1% increase in energy commodity prices)

Effect of 1% increase in energy
commodity prices on producer prices
(deviation from baseline)


Effect of 1% increase in energy
commodity prices on consumer prices
(deviation from baseline)




PPENE: PPI energy; PPINT: PPI intermediate goods; PPCONS: PPI consumer goods; CPFDPR: HICP
processed food; CPNEIG: HICP non-energy industrial goods; CPSERV: HICP services, CPEX: HICP excluding
unprocessed food and energy.

The impact on consumer prices according to our models is roughly in line with that of
different macro-models when taking into account the fact that we only consider the HICP
excluding unprocessed food and energy here. In particular, the ECB AWM, the EC QUEST,

11 See European Central Bank (2004).

И ECB

Working Paper Series No 1104

November 2009



More intriguing information

1. Innovation and business performance - a provisional multi-regional analysis
2. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources
8. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
9. The name is absent
10. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7
14. Knowledge and Learning in Complex Urban Renewal Projects; Towards a Process Design
15. Constrained School Choice
16. Gianluigi Zenti, President, Academia Barilla SpA - The Changing Consumer: Demanding but Predictable
17. Structural Conservation Practices in U.S. Corn Production: Evidence on Environmental Stewardship by Program Participants and Non-Participants
18. The name is absent
19. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
20. The name is absent