Estimating the Economic Value of Specific Characteristics Associated with Angus Bulls Sold at Auction



Jones et al.: Value of Bull Characteristics

331


in future production sales. In fact, as the
purebred bull market continues to evolve,
more emphasis will likely be placed on EPD
information.

The results of this study facilitate the
estimation of relative bull prices. It is impor-
tant to note, however, that other consider-
ations, such as physical appearance and
structural soundness, are often used by buyers
to determine price and that these factors are
not included in our models. These subjective
measures may be as important to buyers as the
genetic information contained in EPDs and
actual weights and, at times, are certainly
significant in determining value. This does not


imply that the exclusion of this information
damages the results of this study. The large
sample sizes used in the models provide
enough variation among the observations to
provide reliable estimates.

This study has furthered our knowledge of
the value of EPDs and other animal charac-
teristics but should not be considered an end
point for research in this field. Additional
work is warranted to further explore the role
of various carcass measures as a component of
a bull’s value. This study was somewhat
limited by inconsistencies in the reporting of
variables between sales, especially variables
pertaining to carcass quality prediction. These


Table 7. (Continued)

Variable

Parameter
Estimate

Standard

Error

t-
Statistic

p-
Value

Marginal
Effect at
Average
Price

Discrete

Variable
Shifts

Elasticities
at Variable
Averages

sale48

20.030620

0.047150

20.649

0.5160

278.11

sale51***

20.234240

0.055340

24.233

0.0000

2540.92

sale52***

0.387810

0.052840

7.339

0.0000

1,227.15

sale53

0.081670

0.055170

1.480

0.1390

220.43

sale54***

20.275670

0.058180

24.738

0.0000

2624.09

sale55

0.037280

0.052180

0.715

0.4750

98.39

sale60***

0.250160

0.052150

4.797

0.0000

736.24

R2

0.6286

Observations

3,768

*** Denotes significance at the 0.01 level.

** Denotes significance at the 0.05 level.

* Denotes significance at the 0.1 level.

Table 8. Summary Statistics for Equation (3)

Variable

N

Mean

Standard Deviation

Minimum

Maximum

price

3,768

2,652.50

2,157.25

875.00

40,000.00

age

3,768

456.91

121.22

285.00

1,829.00

birthwt

3,768

83.29

10.14

45.00

120.00

adjweanwt

3,768

664.07

70.92

408.00

930.00

adjyearwt

3,768

1,190.09

103.53

842.00

1,742.00

birthepd

3,761

2.58

1.48

22.50

7.80

weanepd

3,761

38.53

6.34

14.00

59.00

milkepd

3,761

20.77

4.50

1.00

34.00

yearepd

3,761

73.86

11.18

29.00

108.00

uimfepd

3,768

0.07

0.14

20.40

0.74

uribepd

3,768

0.14

0.22

20.58

1.00

ufatepd

3,768

0.00

0.02

20.06

0.06

uprpepd

3,768

0.04

0.28

20.87

1.20

saleorder

3,768

0.50

0.29

0.00

1.00



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms
3. The name is absent
4. The changing face of Chicago: demographic trends in the 1990s
5. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
6. Long-Term Capital Movements
7. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES