Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development



5. Firms and the Macro-Economy

A large number of firms produces with a constant returns to scale technology using capital K ,
human capital, and land, X . Human capital is given by the number of young adults, L, times
their human capital endowment, h. Supply of land is fixed, technological progress is exogenous,
and the production function is of Cobb-Douglas type and the same as in Galor and Weil (1998).

Yt = At K (Lih t)α(1)X(1)(1) ,  0 <α 1,0 <β< 1 ,            (12)

where A denotes the level of general productivity. The parameter α measures the importance of
arable land. If α = 1, land plays no role in production. According with the empirical evidence we
assume that arable land per capita is of limited supply (particularly in geographically unfavorable
regions) and decreases with population growth (see the evidence cited in Sachs et al., 2004).

Factors are paid according to their marginal product. The interest rate is given by the world
market. Substituting (12) into r =
βY∕K, solving for K, and re- substituting into (12), provides
Yt = At(Ltht)αX1 where At A1/(1—β) (в/г)в/(1—β). Labor income per adult is obtained as
y
t = α(1 β)Yt∕Lt, or after substituting Yt and normalizing land to one as

yt = α(1 β)AtLα-1hα .                                (13)

Assume now that human capital endowment of the current work force depends positively on
child expenditure of their parents, h
t+1 = f (ht). Because the number of workers depends on
fertility of their parents (and child survival rates at that time), and both fertility and child
expenditure depend on income, equation (13) provides the link between generational income
levels. Next generation’s income is given by

yt+1 = α(1 β)(1+ gA)At [(1 + gL(yt)) Lt]α- 1 [f (h(∏(yt)))]α   .

Justified by the focus of analysis on developing economies we assume that productivity grows at
an exogenously given rate g
A. Let xt At∕Lt1 define a labor supply adjusted measure of pro-
ductivity and let us for notational convenience assume that human capital expenditure of parents
relates one-to-one to human capital endowment of their children, h
t+1 = ht. Macroeconomic

14



More intriguing information

1. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
2. Feature type effects in semantic memory: An event related potentials study
3. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
4. Firm Creation, Firm Evolution and Clusters in Chile’s Dynamic Wine Sector: Evidence from the Colchagua and Casablanca Regions
5. Yield curve analysis
6. On the origin of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect
7. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
8. Bidding for Envy-Freeness: A Procedural Approach to n-Player Fair Division Problems
9. The name is absent
10. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
11. XML PUBLISHING SOLUTIONS FOR A COMPANY
12. The name is absent
13. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
14. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
15. The name is absent
16. Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation
17. Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament
18. International Financial Integration*
19. LOCAL CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE
20. Consciousness, cognition, and the hierarchy of context: extending the global neuronal workspace model