+ 2 × Ks{1(yt ≤ g(xt ))- F(g(xt)| Z)}{F(g(xs)| zs)- θ}
+ Kts {F (g ( xt ) | zt ) - θ} {F (g ( xs ) | Zs ) - θ}
= H1T(s,t,g)+2H2T(s,t,g)+H3T(s,t,g)
(A.17)
1 TT
Then let J.[g] =-----------∑ ∑ H.τSs,t,g) , i = 1,2,3 . We will treat
j T(T- 1)hm jT
Jj[Qθ]-Jj[Qθ-CT] for j=1,2,3 separately.
[1] Thm/2 [ Ji( Qθ ) - Ji( Qθ - Ct )] = Op (1):
By simple manipulation, we have
J1(Qθ)-J1(Qθ-CT)
=-----1-----∑ ∑ [H1 t (s, t, Qθ ) - H1T (s, t, Qθ - Ct )]
m 1Tθ1TθT
T(T- 1)h t=1 s≠t
1 TT
= τ,τ nm∑∑ Ks{ [11(Qθ)-F(Qθ)][1 s(Q)-F(Qθ)]
T(T- 1)h t=1 s≠t
-[1t(Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ-CT)][1s(Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ-CT)] } (A.18)
To avoid tedious works to get bounds on the second moment of J1(Qθ)-J1(Qθ-CT )
with dependent data, we note that the R.H.S. of (A.18) is a degenerate U-statistic of order 2.
Thus we can apply Lemma 2 and have
Thm/2 [J1(Qθ) - J1(Qθ -Ct)] → N(0,c12) in distribution, (A.19)
where the definition of the asymptotic variance σ12 is based on the i.i.d. sequence having the
same marginal distributions as weakly dependent variables in (A.18). That is,
σ12 =E%[H1T(s,t,Qθ)-H1T(s,t,Qθ-CT)],
where the notation E% is expectation evaluated at an i.i.d. sequence having the same
marginal distribution as the mixing sequences in (A.18) (Fan and Li (1999), p. 248). Now, to
show that Thm/2 [ J1 (Qθ ) - J1(Qθ - Ct )] = Op (1) , we only need to show that the asymptotic
14
More intriguing information
1. Tissue Tracking Imaging for Identifying the Origin of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias: A New Role of Cardiac Ultrasound in Electrophysiology2. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development
3. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
4. The name is absent
5. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
6. An Incentive System for Salmonella Control in the Pork Supply Chain
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1
10. I nnovative Surgical Technique in the Management of Vallecular Cyst