+ 2 × Ks{1(yt ≤ g(xt ))- F(g(xt)| Z)}{F(g(xs)| zs)- θ}
+ Kts {F (g ( xt ) | zt ) - θ} {F (g ( xs ) | Zs ) - θ}
= H1T(s,t,g)+2H2T(s,t,g)+H3T(s,t,g)
(A.17)
1 TT
Then let J.[g] =-----------∑ ∑ H.τSs,t,g) , i = 1,2,3 . We will treat
j T(T- 1)hm jT
Jj[Qθ]-Jj[Qθ-CT] for j=1,2,3 separately.
[1] Thm/2 [ Ji( Qθ ) - Ji( Qθ - Ct )] = Op (1):
By simple manipulation, we have
J1(Qθ)-J1(Qθ-CT)
=-----1-----∑ ∑ [H1 t (s, t, Qθ ) - H1T (s, t, Qθ - Ct )]
m 1Tθ1TθT
T(T- 1)h t=1 s≠t
1 TT
= τ,τ nm∑∑ Ks{ [11(Qθ)-F(Qθ)][1 s(Q)-F(Qθ)]
T(T- 1)h t=1 s≠t
-[1t(Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ-CT)][1s(Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ-CT)] } (A.18)
To avoid tedious works to get bounds on the second moment of J1(Qθ)-J1(Qθ-CT )
with dependent data, we note that the R.H.S. of (A.18) is a degenerate U-statistic of order 2.
Thus we can apply Lemma 2 and have
Thm/2 [J1(Qθ) - J1(Qθ -Ct)] → N(0,c12) in distribution, (A.19)
where the definition of the asymptotic variance σ12 is based on the i.i.d. sequence having the
same marginal distributions as weakly dependent variables in (A.18). That is,
σ12 =E%[H1T(s,t,Qθ)-H1T(s,t,Qθ-CT)],
where the notation E% is expectation evaluated at an i.i.d. sequence having the same
marginal distribution as the mixing sequences in (A.18) (Fan and Li (1999), p. 248). Now, to
show that Thm/2 [ J1 (Qθ ) - J1(Qθ - Ct )] = Op (1) , we only need to show that the asymptotic
14
More intriguing information
1. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region2. The Complexity Era in Economics
3. The name is absent
4. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
5. Impacts of Tourism and Fiscal Expenditure on Remote Islands in Japan: A Panel Data Analysis
6. Economie de l’entrepreneur faits et théories (The economics of entrepreneur facts and theories)
7. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights
8. Commitment devices, opportunity windows, and institution building in Central Asia
9. THE ECONOMICS OF COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE- THE IRISH CASE STUDY.
10. The name is absent