A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile



variance σ12(z) is o(1) with i.i.d data. We have

E% [H1T(s,t,Qθ)-H1T(s,t,Qθ-CT)]2

≤ Λ E% { [1t(Qθ) - Ft(Qθ)][1s(Qθ) - Fs(Qθ)]

-[1t(Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ-CT)][1s(Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ-CT)] }2

≤Λ E%{Ft(Qθ)[1-Ft(Qθ)]Fs(Qθ)[1-Fs(Qθ)]}

+E%{Ft(Qθ-CT)[1-Ft(Qθ-CT)]Fs(Qθ-CT)[1-Fs(Qθ-CT)]}

-2E{ [Ft(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ)Ft(Qθ-CT)]

×[Fs(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ)Fs(Qθ-CT)] }

E%{[Ft(Qθ)-Ft(Qθ)Ft(Qθ)][Fs(Qθ)-Fs(Qθ)Fs(Qθ)]}

E%{ [Ft(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ)Ft(Qθ-CT)]

×[Fs(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ)Fs(Qθ-CT)] }

E%{ [Ft(Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ-CT)Ft(Qθ-CT)]

×[Fs(Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ-CT)Fs(Qθ-CT)] }

E%{ [Ft(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ)Ft(Qθ-CT)]

×[Fs(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ)Fs(Qθ-CT)] }

≤Λ Ct = o (1).                                                       (A.20)

where the last equality holds by the smoothness of conditional distribution function and its

bounded first derivative due to Assumption (A.8). Thus we have

Thm,[ J,( Qθ ) - Jɪ( Qθ - C )] = Op (1)                                  (A.21)
[2]
Thm'2[J2(Qβ)- J2(Qβ -C)] = Op(1):

Noting that H2t (5, t, Qθ ) = 0 because of Fyz (Qθ (xs ) | zs ) - θ = 0, we have

J2(Qθ)-J2(Qθ-CT)

15



More intriguing information

1. Pass-through of external shocks along the pricing chain: A panel estimation approach for the euro area
2. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
3. Education as a Moral Concept
4. Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk
5. Graphical Data Representation in Bankruptcy Analysis
6. Three Policies to Improve Productivity Growth in Canada
7. The name is absent
8. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
9. The name is absent
10. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence