A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile



variance σ12(z) is o(1) with i.i.d data. We have

E% [H1T(s,t,Qθ)-H1T(s,t,Qθ-CT)]2

≤ Λ E% { [1t(Qθ) - Ft(Qθ)][1s(Qθ) - Fs(Qθ)]

-[1t(Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ-CT)][1s(Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ-CT)] }2

≤Λ E%{Ft(Qθ)[1-Ft(Qθ)]Fs(Qθ)[1-Fs(Qθ)]}

+E%{Ft(Qθ-CT)[1-Ft(Qθ-CT)]Fs(Qθ-CT)[1-Fs(Qθ-CT)]}

-2E{ [Ft(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ)Ft(Qθ-CT)]

×[Fs(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ)Fs(Qθ-CT)] }

E%{[Ft(Qθ)-Ft(Qθ)Ft(Qθ)][Fs(Qθ)-Fs(Qθ)Fs(Qθ)]}

E%{ [Ft(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ)Ft(Qθ-CT)]

×[Fs(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ)Fs(Qθ-CT)] }

E%{ [Ft(Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ-CT)Ft(Qθ-CT)]

×[Fs(Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ-CT)Fs(Qθ-CT)] }

E%{ [Ft(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Ft(Qθ)Ft(Qθ-CT)]

×[Fs(min(Qθ,Qθ-CT)-Fs(Qθ)Fs(Qθ-CT)] }

≤Λ Ct = o (1).                                                       (A.20)

where the last equality holds by the smoothness of conditional distribution function and its

bounded first derivative due to Assumption (A.8). Thus we have

Thm,[ J,( Qθ ) - Jɪ( Qθ - C )] = Op (1)                                  (A.21)
[2]
Thm'2[J2(Qβ)- J2(Qβ -C)] = Op(1):

Noting that H2t (5, t, Qθ ) = 0 because of Fyz (Qθ (xs ) | zs ) - θ = 0, we have

J2(Qθ)-J2(Qθ-CT)

15



More intriguing information

1. Ein pragmatisierter Kalkul des naturlichen Schlieβens nebst Metatheorie
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. References
5. CREDIT SCORING, LOAN PRICING, AND FARM BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
6. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
7. The Veblen-Gerschenkron Effect of FDI in Mezzogiorno and East Germany
8. The name is absent
9. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
10. The name is absent