Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case



3 The centralized solution of the model

In the centralized economy, the social planner internalizes the contribution of the econ-
omy’s average level of human capital to goods production. That is, the planner is able to
reach the efficient allocation of resources without the instrument of taxation. Therefore,
we assume τ
r w = 1 throughout this section.

The central planner internalizes the social returns of human capital when choosing his
optimal controls. This means that he exploits the symmetry condition stated in equation
(6) and writes his DOP as follows:

U = sup E0     βt ln ct

{ct ,ut }t=0      t=0

with respect to the state dynamics

kt+1 = Aktαut1-αht1-α+γ -ct,

t N0,

(11)

ht+1 = B (1 - ut) ht,

t N0,

(12)

ln At+1 = ρ ln At + εt+1 ,

t N0,

(13)

kt ≥ 0 and ht ≥ 0,

t N0.

Since the social planner uses the symmetry from (6), he has simply dropped the index
a. Furthermore, the initial values k
0 , h0 , and A0 > 0 are assumed to be given and the
social planner has to ensure that

ct > 0 and 0 ≤ ut ≤ 1

hold for all t N0 . He defines the value function as the solution to his optimization
problem from time t onwards:

V (kt, ht, At) ≡ sup Et
{cs ,us }s=t


∑ βs-t ln Cs

s=t


s.t. (11), (12), and (13).


The Bellman equation associated with the planner’s DOP is given by:

(14)


V (kt, ht, At) = sup {ln ct + βEt [V (kt+1, ht+1, At+1)]} .
ct,ut

The first-order necessary conditions for the optimal consumption choice and the optimal
allocation of human capital between the two sectors are given by:
where V
t stands for V (kt, ht, At) and the asterisk denotes optimality. Equation (15)
describes the behavior along the optimal consumption path. When shifting a marginal
unit of today’s output from consumption to investment, today’s marginal change in
utility should equal the expected discounted marginal change of wealth with respect to
tomorrow’s capital stock. Equation (16) states that the weighted expected marginal
change of wealth with respect to physical capital equals the weighted expected marginal

ct

ut


ɪ = βEt Γ dVM ,
c
*            L ∂kt J ,


„ *
ut


= ( Et[∂⅛] (1-α)At А 1

I   Et[∂ht+1]в   h   hαα


(15)

(16)




More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
3. Skill and work experience in the European knowledge economy
4. Palvelujen vienti ja kansainvälistyminen
5. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland
6. The name is absent
7. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
8. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
9. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
10. Wirtschaftslage und Reformprozesse in Estland, Lettland, und Litauen: Bericht 2001
11. Empirical Calibration of a Least-Cost Conservation Reserve Program
12. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
13. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
14. Beyond Networks? A brief response to ‘Which networks matter in education governance?’
15. The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics
16. Monetary Policy News and Exchange Rate Responses: Do Only Surprises Matter?
17. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
18. Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress
19. Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content
20. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption