Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case



The function V implies the following controls along the welfare-maximizing consumption
and human capital allocation paths:

Ct = (1 - αβ) yt   and   ut = (1-^)+1-β) := u .                (22)

Note that 0 ≤ u ≤ 1 is satisfied even in the strict sense. Furthermore, the allocation of
human capital is constant regardless of the respective endowments of human and physical
capital. The central planner simply devotes a constant share of goods production to
consumption. Surely, findings (22) must also hold in period T such that it is easy to
see that the Euler equations (17) and (19) and the transversality conditions (20) are
satisfied. This remark closes the discussion of the centralized case. In the next section
we turn to the decentralized economy.

4 The decentralized solution of the model

In the decentralized case, we assume a representative agent with rational behavior. The
agent knows that her stock of human capital equals the average level of human capital
in the economy. Furthermore, she knows that the external effects of human capital
in goods production, captured by the term h
γa,t , may increase her and all the other
agents’ wealth. But here, in the decentralized case, the market mechanism prevents
a coordination of agents’ actions. This can be understood as a Nash game producing
the prisoner’s dilemma. For this reason, we introduce a government that taxes and
subsidizes the respective factor compensations. In the first subsection we write down the
representative agent’s optimization problem. Then, the second subsection characterizes
the agent’s optimal behavior. Finally, the third subsection determines the government’s
optimal taxation policy.

4.1 The representative agent’s optimization problem

Although the external effect of the economy’s average human capital stock in period t
may be not exploited, the whole path of h
a,t is predictable and is therefore treated as
given by the agents. The representative agent’s DOP is given by:

U = sup E0
{ct ,ut }t=0

βt ln Ct

t=0

,

with respect to the state dynamics

kt+1 = τrrtkt + τwwtutht -

Ct,

t N0,

(23)

ht+1 = B (1 - ut) ht,

t N0,

(24)

ha,t+1 = B (1 - ua,t) ha,t,

t N0,

(25)

ln At+1 = ρ ln At + εt+1 ,

t N0,

(26)

kt ≥ 0 and ht ≥ 0,

t N0.

The variable ua stands for the average human capital allocation in the decentralized
economy, the value of which cannot be influenced by the representative agent.

We start the analysis of the decentralized economy with the definition of the value
function as the solution to the representative agent’s problem:

βs-t ln Cs
s=t


s.t. (2) - (8).


V (kt, ht; At, ha,t) ≡ sup Et
{c
s ,us }s=t



More intriguing information

1. Outline of a new approach to the nature of mind
2. Altruism with Social Roots: An Emerging Literature
3. The name is absent
4. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
5. Strategic Investment and Market Integration
6. Menarchial Age of Secondary School Girls in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria
7. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
8. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D
9. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
10. Delivering job search services in rural labour markets: the role of ICT
11. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
12. The name is absent
13. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
17. The Interest Rate-Exchange Rate Link in the Mexican Float
18. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
19. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
20. Insecure Property Rights and Growth: The Roles of Appropriation Costs, Wealth Effects, and Heterogeneity