Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade Growth - A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear (Forecasting) Models



Table V: Henrikkson-Merton tests

Exports

Imports

Sec

AT

BE

CA

FI

FR

GE

GC

IR

IT

JP

NL

NO

SW

UK

US

agg

agg*

agg

agg*

0

LIN

1.08

0.91

1.17

1.08

1.03

1.08

0.93

^∏5^

0.93

1.08

0.94

0.99

0.98

1.12

0.96

1.04

1.01

1.00

1.01

THM

1.14

1.22

1.20

1.00

0.89

1.12

0.89

1.18

1.01

1.13

0.89

0.99

0.94

1.03

0.86

1.04

1.00

0.97

1.00

SPA

0.94

1.29

1.16

1.04

0.91

1.05

0.93

1.13

1.04

1.14

1.02

0.94

1.02

1.06

0.97

1.05

1.02

0.97

0.99

I

LIN

1.10

0.83

1.06

0.94

0.93

1.00

1.03

^Γ09^

0.93

1.12

1.01

1.08

1.34

0.94

1.09

1.04

1.07

1.02

"lɪ

THM

1.06

0.89

1.07

0.97

0.95

1.04

1.09

1.04

0.90

1.10

0.88

1.09

1.29

1.06

0.98

1.03

1.08

1.00

1.04

SPA

0.98

1.01

0.98

0.97

0.97

1.03

1.05

1.02

0.91

1.14

0.93

0.96

1.31

1.10

1.06

1.03

1.06

1.03

1.02

2

LIN

0.98

0.87

0.96

0.98

0.95

0.86

1.09

^Γ03^

0.88

0.91

1.02

0.98

1.00

1.03

0.93

0.96

0.97

1.02

"lɪ

THM

1.12

1.21

0.97

1.03

0.85

0.95

1.05

0.98

0.84

0.86

1.02

0.95

1.10

1.12

0.96

1.00

1.00

0.98

1.00

SPA

1.13

1.02

1.03

1.05

1.05

0.94

1.07

0.83

0.78

0.93

1.03

1.00

0.98

0.95

0.97

0.98

0.98

0.98

0.99

3

LIN

0.88

1.00

0.89

0.93

1.08

0.84

0.90

^Γ06^

1.05

1.08

1.07

1.10

1.10

1.06

1.01

1.00

0.99

1.03

"lɪ

THM

0.87

1.03

1.08

0.94

1.03

1.02

0.94

0.95

0.89

0.92

0.83

1.15

1.12

0.95

1.08

0.99

0.99

1.02

1.01

SPA

0.88

1.00

1.00

1.04

1.11

0.93

0.93

0.96

0.86

0.83

0.90

1.17

1.05

0.98

1.00

0.98

0.99

1.05

1.06

4

LIN

1.08

1.04

1.10

0.94

0.94

1.23

0.79

^^097^

1.04

1.00

0.99

0.87

1.06

0.92

1.02

0.99

1.01

1.00

^^O8^

THM

1.02

1.02

0.92

0.96

1.12

1.24

1.08

0.94

1.05

0.95

1.01

0.99

1.09

1.22

1.03

1.03

1.07

1.03

1.02

SPA

1.03

1.02

1.00

1.00

1.10

1.28

1.08

0.83

1.01

0.95

0.94

1.05

1.05

1.07

0.97

1.02

1.01

0.99

0.99

5

LIN

0.97

0.91

0.92

1.13

0.98

1.09

0.92

^^O9^

1.02

1.13

0.75

1.15

1.11

0.95

1.12

1.01

0.98

1.02

"lɪ

THM

0.85

0.99

0.95

1.04

0.99

1.04

0.86

1.01

1.05

0.93

0.91

1.15

1.07

1.12

0.97

1.00

1.00

1.03

1.02

SPA

0.93

1.04

1.00

1.06

1.00

0.95

0.91

0.94

0.99

0.97

0.91

1.12

1.03

1.13

0.97

1.00

0.98

1.01

1.00

6

LIN

1.05

1.04

0.88

1.09

0.94

0.96

0.92

1.05

0.95

1.13

1.08

1.09

1.00

0.91

1.03

1.02

1.01

1.04

1.02

THM

1.15

1.12

0.89

1.02

1.04

0.80

1.00

1.00

0.96

1.00

1.12

1.11

1.04

1.11

0.87

1.02

1.00

1.06

1.07

SPA

1.12

1.05

0.95

1.07

1.04

0.92

1.01

0.99

1.07

0.95

1.18

1.09

1.01

1.08

0.91

1.03

1.02

1.03

1.04



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The Shepherd Sinfonia
6. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
7. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
8. FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS
9. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
10. The name is absent