Graphical Data Representation in Bankruptcy Analysis



W. K. Hardle, R. A. Moro, and D. Schafer

3 Company Score Evaluation

The company score is computed as:

f (x) = xτw + b,

(9)


where w = ^П=1 αiyixi and b = 11 (x+ + x-)τw; x+ and x- are the obser-
vations from the opposite classes for which constraint (1) becomes equality.
By substituting the scalar product with a kernel function we will derive a
non-linear score function:

n

f(x) =     K(xi , x)αi yi + b.

(10)


i=1

The non-parametric score function (10) does not have a compact closed
form representation. This necessitates the use of graphical tools for its visu-
alisation.

4 Variable Selection

In this section we describe the procedure and the graphical tools for selecting
the variables of the SVM model used in forecasts. We have two most im-
portant criteria of model accuracy: the accuracy ratio (AR), which will be
used here as a criterion for model selection, (Figure 6) and the percentage of
correctly classified out-of-sample observations. Higher values indicate better
model accuracy.

Fig. 6. The power curves for a perfect (green), random (red) and some real (blue)
classification models. The AR is the ratio of two areas
A/B. It lies between 0 for a
random model with no predictive power and 1 for a perfect model.




More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. EMU's Decentralized System of Fiscal Policy
3. The name is absent
4. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Palvelujen vienti ja kansainvälistyminen
9. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
10. Dendritic Inhibition Enhances Neural Coding Properties