is ye+n1q =3qK (1 ´ °) i i (x i bt) 5. N et return from education fcrertrepre
neurs is qK i i h, that is, as above, the gross return less the opportunity
costofeducation.
Each agent; ifsuXαcntly rich toa3ord education, ...nds it e≈ actively
pro,,tabletoinvestinhumaneapital. InfactI assumethatthenetmargjnal
returnfrom educationispositiveboth forentrepreneurs andforworkers. The
netmarginalreturn from education is positive ifbene.ts (higherincomes)
aregreaterthan costs (directcosts (h) and indirectcosts (i)), i.e ± > i and
qK > i.
G iven theassumptions above, andbecauseofthenon-convexityofhuman
capitalinvestmenttechnology, educationalchoice depends only on the level
of initial individual wealth: all the agents who can self-.nance education
do invest in human capital. The quali.ed percentage ofthe population is
therefore [1 i G (h)], sinceG (h) is theperc≡ntacpcfthepcpuIaticn having
initial wealth lower than h. In particular; given the hypothesis according
to which progenitors’ wealth is uniformly distributed on the support (0; 1),
the cμali...ed percentage of the . rst generation is 1 i h; whereas h is the
non-quali.ed progenitors’share.
G iventheinterestrate, thewage, therelativepriceofcapitalandphysical
capital investment technology, occupational choice exclusively depends on
the individual degree of technical ineXdαncy. A ctualy given individual
preferences, it is pro.table to undertake the entrepreneurialproject ifand
only ifentrepreneurialincome is notlowerthan worker’s income.
A cμaii...ed agent chooses to become entrepreneur ifhis degree oftechni-
c∏∣ inetdency is lowerorecμal toa threshold level pejnq = qK qiK w, with
^e,nq = 0 for qK < ix + w
0 ∙ ^e,nq ∙ 1 forqK ^ix + w .
This threshold levelis a decreasing function ofthe interestrate, ofthe
inputrecuirementand ofthe unskilled labourwage, while itincreases with
qK. T he higher the interest rate the input recqui rement and the wage and
the ower the gross return from investment per LnitofdXdency qK, the
5Notethatentrepreneurialincomeisformallythesameeitherheis licuidityconstrained
ornot. A ctually ifhe can self-.nance his project, he invests x in the projectand the rest
(bt i h) in the capital market- atthe gross interest rate i. T he income ofa self...nanced
quaii...ed entrepreneur is thereforeye;q = qk (1 i ° + h) + i (bt i h ∣ x): T he income of
a self...nanced non-quali...ed entrepreneur is y^nJq = qk (1 i ° )+ i (bt i x) : T he human
capitalinvestmentchoice described belowrules outthe existence ofa fully collateralized
non-cuali.ed entrepreneuranyways.
More intriguing information
1. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi2. A dynamic approach to the tendency of industries to cluster
3. AN IMPROVED 2D OPTICAL FLOW SENSOR FOR MOTION SEGMENTATION
4. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case
5. The name is absent
6. Weather Forecasting for Weather Derivatives
7. The name is absent
8. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
9. The name is absent
10. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education