The name is absent



Protected areas (family II): surface of protected areas (source: elaboration from Istat
Sistema Sanitario e Salute della Popolazione
, table 12.2). It favors the conversion of
Environmental Quality, thus it is a multiplier.

Public green (family II): number of families which lives close (less then 15 minutes
on foot) to a park or a garden, year 1998 (source: elaboration from
ASRL, table
57.05.08). This indicator favors the perception of Environmental Quality.

Public transportation (family II): percentage of workers using public transportation to
commute to work, year 1997 (source:
Istat Indagine Multiscopo 1997, Vita
Quotidiana
, table 14.4). It is favorable to Environmental Quality.

Hazardous firms (family II): number of potentially hazardous plants according to
Italian law (DPR 175/1988, art. 4), year 1999 (source:
ASRL, table 24.02.04.01).
Hampering the conversion of the indicator of the state of the environment, it is a
divisor of the latter.

Traffic (family II): percentage of families declaring bad traffic conditions, year 1997
(source:
Istat Indagine Multiscopo 1997, Vita Quotidiana, table 22.1). It is
unfavorable to the state of the environment.

Urban pressure (family II): percentage of urban dwellers, year 1999 (source:
elaboration from
Istat Sistema Sanitario e Salute della Popolazione, table 12.1). It
hampers the conversion of Environmental Quality.

Table 3 - Conversion factors for Environmental Quality

Favorable                 Non favorable

Protected areas

Hazardous firms

Public green

Traffic

Public transportation

Urban pressure

The “converted contribution” of Environmental Quality to the functioning PPH is then:

Environmental Quality * Protected areas * Public green * Public transportation /

Hazardous firms / Traffic / Urban pressure                             (5)

Security

The indicator chosen to represent Security concerns the percentage of people who feel safe,
year 1998 (source: elaboration from
ASRL, table 57.06.02). Security is a determinant of well-
being, for it accrues the livability of a community.

The conversion factors of Security are the following.

Defense (family III social conditions): number of family who installed security
systems, year 1998 (source:
ASRL, table 31.06.01.01). This indicator suggests an
improvement in Security, thus it is a multiplier.

Difficulty (family III): difficulty to reach police stations, year 1998 (source: Istat,
Indicatori regionali per la valutazione delle politiche di sviluppo
, table V.04). It is
unfavorable to Security.

Social deterioration (family III): percentage of people over 14 perceiving social
deterioration (source:
ASRL, table 57.06.03). It hampers the conversion of Security.

Table 4 - Conversion factors for Security

Favorable                 Non favorable

17



More intriguing information

1. Solidaristic Wage Bargaining
2. Popular Conceptions of Nationhood in Old and New European
3. The name is absent
4. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers
5. The name is absent
6. The Role of Immigration in Sustaining the Social Security System: A Political Economy Approach
7. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
8. Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California
9. A Study of Prospective Ophthalmology Residents’ Career Perceptions
10. The name is absent
11. Strategic Planning on the Local Level As a Factor of Rural Development in the Republic of Serbia
12. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
13. The name is absent
14. QUEST II. A Multi-Country Business Cycle and Growth Model
15. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
16. The Global Dimension to Fiscal Sustainability
17. The name is absent
18. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?
19. Accurate and robust image superresolution by neural processing of local image representations
20. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks