|
X |
У |
x + У |
T(x, У) |
t(x, y) |
L(x) |
l(x) |
K(y) |
k(y) |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
1.05 |
0.35 |
0.80 |
0.40 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
|
3 |
4 |
7 |
3.25 |
0.46 |
1.25 |
0.42 |
2.00 |
0.50 |
|
6 |
5 |
11 |
5.60 |
0.51 |
2.60 |
0.43 |
3.00 |
0.60 |
Table A.1. Income distributions and quasi-progressive dual tax schedule.
Consider also the following two reforms: T1,3(x,y) = T(x,y) — 0.1 ∙ L(x) — 0.24 ∙ y and
T3,2(x,y) = T(x,y) — 0.232 ∙ x — 0.6585 ∙ (y — K(y)), which applied to the above tax and
income distributions result in the table below:
|
x |
У |
L1,3(x) |
K1,3(y) |
T1,3(x, У) |
L3,2(x) |
К3,2(у) |
T3,2(x, У) |
|
2 |
1 |
0.72 |
0.01 |
0.73 |
0.34 |
0.20 |
0.54 |
|
3 |
4 |
1.13 |
1.04 |
2.17 |
0.55 |
1.87 |
2.42 |
|
6 |
5 |
2.34 |
1.80 |
4.14 |
1.21 |
2.87 |
4.08 |
Table A.2. Dual tax cuts.
Observe that the two reforms proposed are not separately labor and capital yield-equivalent,
although they are globally yield-equivalent -the aggregate total tax liability is approximately
equal to 7.04-. That is, Condition 1 does not hold.
On the other hand, if we take into account the discrete definition of the residual progres-
sion it can be obtained17 that, given an income distribution z = (z1 ≤ ... ≤ zn), and two
reforms T1(z) y T2(z), if ψT1 (zi, zi+1) > ψT2 (zi, zi+1) for some zi, i ∈ {1, ..., n — 1}, then
(17)
V1(zi+1) > V2(zi+1)
Vι(zi) V2(zi) .
Hence, it can be checked that, by (17),
V1L3(3,4) < V3,2(3,4) V1K3(3,4) > V3K2(3,4) V1,3(3,4) > V3,2(3,4)
V1L3(2,1) < V3L2(2,1), V^D > V3,2(2,1) , V1,3(2,1) > V3,2(2,1) ,
viL3(6,5) < v3L2(6,5) V1K3(6,5) > v3K2(6,5) V1,3(6,5) < V3,2(6,5)
V1L3(3,4) < V3l2(3,4) , V K3 3,∣ > V3k2(3,4) , V1,3(3,4) < V3,2(3,4),
17 V1(zi+1)-V1(zi) . Zi 3 V2(zi+1)-V2(zi) . Zi ,. V1(zi+1)-V1(zi) 3 V2(zi+1)-V2(zi) ,. V1 (zi+1) _ -∣ 3
V1(zi) zi+1-zi V2(zi) zi+1-zi V1(zi) V2(zi) V1(zi)
V2(zi+1) _ -∣ ,. V1 (zi+1) 3 V2(zi+1)
V2(zi) V1(zi) V2(zi)
34
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Female Empowerment: Impact of a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines
3. The name is absent
4. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand
5. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
6. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
7. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness