XREAP2007-14
Table 3. Fiscal rule, (1) and (6): US, 1962-2000.
|
federal government |
panel of state governments___________ | |||
|
(1)_______ |
(6) |
(1)___________ |
(6)___________ | |
|
P |
0.08 |
0.08 |
0.10 |
0.08 |
|
(0.01) |
(0.01) |
(0.00) |
(0.00) | |
|
α |
0.08 |
-0.06 | ||
|
(0.35) |
(0.00) | |||
|
obs |
^38 |
38 |
1887 |
1887 |
|
R2 |
0.19 |
0.20 |
0.08 |
0.10 |
|
R2 within |
0.05 |
0.07 | ||
|
R2 between |
0.21 |
0.19 | ||
|
R2 overall |
0.08 |
0.10 | ||
|
Hausmann |
1059.31 |
1144.58 | ||
|
(0.00) |
(0.00) | |||
|
1967 |
1992 |
- |
- | |
|
AQ |
(0.08) |
(0.36) | ||
|
AP |
(0.03) |
(0.18) | ||
|
Bai |
1966 |
1994 | ||
|
(0.00) |
(0.00) | |||
|
[-;-] |
[-;-] | |||
Notes: heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation robust OLS
estimates; AQ and AP indicate the corrected Andrews Quandt
and Andrews Ploberger break date for the fiscal rule; the
breaktest of Bai is Bai (1997), with the 33% confidence
interval.
Table 4. Fiscal rules for government tiers, system estimates (3), German Lander, 1970-2005.
|
all 1970-2 |
Lander |
old 1970-2 |
Lander |
old |
Lander 990 |
old 1991-2 |
Lander >005 |
new 1991-2 |
Lander | |
|
P__ |
p-value |
P__ |
p-value |
P__ |
p-value |
P__ |
p-value |
P__ |
p-value | |
|
federal |
-0.01 |
(0.36) |
-0.01 |
(0.38) |
-0.06 |
(0.06) |
0.00 |
(0.88) |
0.00 |
(0.89) |
|
BE |
0.00 |
(0.00) |
0.00 |
(0.00) |
0.00 |
(0.01) |
0.00 |
(0.04) |
0.00 |
(0.04) |
|
BW |
0.00 |
(0.35) |
0.00 |
(0.34) |
0.00 |
(0.67) |
0.00 |
(0.24) | ||
|
BY |
0.00 |
(0.03) |
0.00 |
(0.03) |
0.00 |
(0.86) |
0.00 |
(0.49) | ||
|
HB |
0.00 |
(0.01) |
0.00 |
(0.01) |
0.00 |
(0.10) |
0.00 |
(0.87) | ||
|
HE |
0.00 |
(0.06) |
0.00 |
(0.06) |
0.00 |
(0.24) |
0.00 |
(0.14) | ||
|
HH |
0.00 |
(0.71) |
0.00 |
(0.71) |
0.00 |
(0.91) |
0.00 |
(0.23) | ||
|
NI |
0.00 |
(0.75) |
0.00 |
(0.76) |
0.00 |
(0.18) |
0.00 |
(0.01) | ||
|
NW |
0.00 |
(0.26) |
0.00 |
(0.26) |
0.00 |
(0.00) |
0.00 |
(0.00) | ||
|
RP |
0.00 |
(0.70) |
0.00 |
(0.71) |
0.00 |
(0.76) |
0.00 |
(0.00) | ||
|
SH |
0.00 |
(0.08) |
0.00 |
(0.08) |
0.00 |
(0.46) |
0.00 |
(0.10) | ||
|
SL |
0.00 |
(0.19) |
0.00 |
(0.19) |
0.00 |
(0.00) |
0.00 |
(0.04) | ||
|
BB |
0.00 |
(0.00) |
0.00 |
(0.00) | ||||||
|
MV |
0.00 |
(0.20) |
0.00 |
(0.12) | ||||||
|
SN |
0.00 |
(0.00) |
0.00 |
(0.00) | ||||||
|
ST |
0.00 |
(0.00) |
0.00 |
(0.00) | ||||||
|
TH |
0.00 |
(0.00) |
0.00 |
(0.00) | ||||||
|
sum |
0.01 |
(0.21) |
0.00 |
(0.29) |
0.00 |
(0.38) |
0.00 |
(0.20) |
0.01 |
(0.03) |
22
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
3. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
4. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
5. On the Desirability of Taxing Charitable Contributions
6. The name is absent
7. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
8. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent