XREAP2007-14
Notes: p-values between parentheses, Lander names in bold are former West-German states; for the
specification for Germany, a shift dummy and time trend is included since 1991 for the full sample
estimates.
Table 5. Fiscal rule, (1) and (6), German federal government
|
federal government__________________________________________________________________ | ||||||
|
1971-2005____________________ |
1971-1990_______________ |
1991-2005_______________ | ||||
|
(1)_____________ |
(6)_______________ |
(1)__________ |
(6) |
(1)___________ |
(6) | |
|
P |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
-0.05 |
-0.04 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
|
(0.75) |
(0.76) |
(0.46) |
(0.38) |
(0.44) |
(0.21) | |
|
α |
0.59 |
0.30 |
0.31 | |||
|
(0.61) |
(0.08) |
(0.83) | ||||
|
obs |
34 |
34 |
20 |
~1λ |
~4 |
~~L4 |
|
R2 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.23 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
|
1975 |
1976 |
- |
- |
- |
- | |
|
AQ |
(0.23) |
(0.29) | ||||
|
AP |
(0.14) |
(0.19) | ||||
|
Bai |
1984 |
1979 | ||||
|
(0.00) |
(0.00) | |||||
|
[1979;1984] |
[1977;1981] | |||||
Notes: heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation robust OLS estimates; AQ and AP indicate the
corrected Andrews Quandt and Andrews Ploberger break date for the fiscal rule; the
breaktest of Bai is Bai (1997), with the 33% confidence interval; for the specification for
Germany, a shift dummy and time trend is included since 1991 for the full sample estimates.
Table 6. Fiscal rule, panel fixed effects, panel of German Lander
|
all Lander________ |
old Lander________________________ |
new Lander____ | ||||||
|
1970-2005 |
1970-1990 |
1991-2005 |
1991-2005 | |||||
|
(1)______ |
(6)_______ |
(1)_____ |
(6) |
(1)______ |
(6) |
(1)_____ |
(6) | |
|
P |
0.01 |
-0.03 |
-0.01 |
0.05 |
-0.05 |
-0.05 |
0.08 |
-0.02 |
|
(0.58) |
(0.04) |
(0.24) |
(0.68) |
(0.03) |
(0.02) |
(0.03) |
(0.40) | |
|
α |
-0.09 |
0.08 |
0.01 |
-0.16 | ||||
|
(0.00) |
(0.00) |
(0.57) |
(0.00) | |||||
|
obs |
439 |
439 |
220 |
220 |
154 |
154 |
78 |
78 |
|
R2 within |
0.01 |
0.13 |
0.02 |
0.11 |
0.14 |
0.13 |
0.24 |
0.55 |
|
R2 between |
0.61 |
0.88 |
0.95 |
0.09 |
0.43 |
0.42 |
0.93 |
0.11 |
|
R2 overall |
0.11 |
0.30 |
0.35 |
0.03 |
0.34 |
0.34 |
0.01 |
0.35 |
|
Hausman |
150.85 |
41.05 |
62.27 |
70.93 |
358.51 |
340.05 |
24.51 |
10.93 |
|
(0.00) |
(0.00) |
(0.00) |
(0.00) |
(0.00) |
(0.00) |
(0.00) |
(0.00) | |
Notes: p-values between parentheses; for the specification for Germany, a shift dummy and
time trend is included since 1991 for the full sample estimates.
23
More intriguing information
1. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-20042. The name is absent
3. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
4. Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis
5. The name is absent
6. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
10. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY