Figure 2: The Importance of Sub-Central Levels of Government and the Extent of
Fiscal Control
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
♦ GERMANY
ɪ MEXICO
♦ NORWAY
AUSTRIA
♦ SWITZERLAND
SWEDEN
♦
♦ DENMARK
♦ BELGIUM
♦ JAPAN
♦ FINLAND
♦ ICELAND
♦ CZECH REPUBLIC ♦ SPAIN
PORTUGAL φ
♦ ♦HUNGARY
POLAND
uk N NEW ZEALAND
NETHERLANDS
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Index of Fiscal Control
Source: IMF Government Financial Statistics and OECD (1999)
Note: Figures relate to 1995. Details on the construction of the Index of Fiscal Control are given in
the appendix..
It is apparent that, although the UK’s local government layer has a reasonable degree of
autonomy, the sub-central levels of government in the UK control a very small proportion of
total taxation. In contrast, whilst sub-national jurisdictions in Scandinavia, Belgium and
Japan have slightly lower degrees of fiscal control, the total importance of sub-central
government is much greater. We also see some contrasts between federal states. Switzerland
grants its sub-central governments the greatest control over taxation as indicated by the high
percentage of sub-central taxation. In contrast, German and Austrian Lander have less fiscal
control than might appear at first sight.
11