Figure 2: The Importance of Sub-Central Levels of Government and the Extent of
Fiscal Control
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
♦ GERMANY
ɪ MEXICO
♦ NORWAY
AUSTRIA
♦ SWITZERLAND
SWEDEN
♦
♦ DENMARK
♦ BELGIUM
♦ JAPAN
♦ FINLAND
♦ ICELAND
♦ CZECH REPUBLIC ♦ SPAIN
PORTUGAL φ
♦ ♦HUNGARY
POLAND
uk N NEW ZEALAND
NETHERLANDS
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Index of Fiscal Control
Source: IMF Government Financial Statistics and OECD (1999)
Note: Figures relate to 1995. Details on the construction of the Index of Fiscal Control are given in
the appendix..
It is apparent that, although the UK’s local government layer has a reasonable degree of
autonomy, the sub-central levels of government in the UK control a very small proportion of
total taxation. In contrast, whilst sub-national jurisdictions in Scandinavia, Belgium and
Japan have slightly lower degrees of fiscal control, the total importance of sub-central
government is much greater. We also see some contrasts between federal states. Switzerland
grants its sub-central governments the greatest control over taxation as indicated by the high
percentage of sub-central taxation. In contrast, German and Austrian Lander have less fiscal
control than might appear at first sight.
11
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia
3. The name is absent
4. Trade Liberalization, Firm Performance and Labour Market Outcomes in the Developing World: What Can We Learn from Micro-LevelData?
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Dynamic Explanations of Industry Structure and Performance
8. Regional Intergration and Migration: An Economic Geography Model with Hetergenous Labour Force
9. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003
10. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS