Fiscal federalism and Fiscal Autonomy: Lessons for the UK from other Industrialised Countries



Figure 3: Fiscal Imbalances

Tax and Non-Tax Revenues and Expenditure of Sub-Central Governments

Source: IMF Government Financial Statistics

Notes:

1. Revenues include taxes, fees and other sources of non-tax revenues but exclude grants.

2. The figures are expressed as percentages of general government totals. Transfers from central
government to lower tiers of government are excluded from the general government figure.

3. The date for which each country’s data is plotted is given in the notes to figure 1.

Another indication of the extent to which governments have access to their own taxation
resources to meet their expenditure commitments is given by Figure 3. This shows the degree
of vertical imbalances present in the taxation and expenditure systems of various OECD
countries. More specifically, Figure 3 plots the share of sub-central tax and non-tax revenues
excluding grants against expenditure by sub-central governments, both given as percentages
of the appropriate general government totals. The vertical distance between each point and
the 45-degree line shows the extent to which sub-central jurisdictions are dependent on
central government grants. We have shown two points for the UK, with UK
1 showing the
pre-devolution position and UK
2, the situation after devolution (there is obviously no change

12



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Artificial neural networks as models of stimulus control*
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model
8. Multifunctionality of Agriculture: An Inquiry Into the Complementarity Between Landscape Preservation and Food Security
9. Biological Control of Giant Reed (Arundo donax): Economic Aspects
10. A Brief Introduction to the Guidance Theory of Representation