The name is absent



long term maturity ( n )
6      12     24     36     60     120

reg 1  mean(β) 0.9836 0.9792 0.9814 0.9871  0.9954  1.0104

stdev(β) 0.0472 0.0496 0.0529 0.0518 0.0578 0.0434

reg 2  mean(β) 0.7904 0.9628 0.9930 0.9651  0.9748 0.9848

stdev(β) 0.4327 0.0530 0.0701  0.0776 0.0689 0.0494

linear mean(β) 0.4151  0.5671  0.6323 0.8385 0.9929 0.9401

stdev(β) 0.6603 0.4427 0.5608 0.7087 0.6486 0.5103

Linear model rolling 60 obs; regimes 1 and 2 rolling 50 obs

Table 8

A financial interpretation rationalizes our empirical results. Campbell argues that a large bias
downward of the estimated slope coefficient is due to a small variance of the rationally expected
changes in short rates relative to the variance of the term premium. That is, the expectations theory
holds when investors are well informed about future movements in short rates.

According to Campbell and Shiller (1991) we can decompose the spread into into an expectational
component (
theoretical spread) and the term premium:

n-m

m

+ tptn,m


Eim

t t + mq

q=0

(11)

= thsptn,m + tptn,m

The variance of the spread depends on the variance of both its components plus twice their

24
covariance :

n m                  n,m              n,m                      n,m     n,m

var ut — it j= varuripjt ∫+ var ipt ∫+ 2cov urispt , tpt ∫ =

(12)

n      m        nm

= var{it}+ var{it }- 2 cov{it, it }

As shown in the bottom panel of Table 9, in the single regime model for n36, the standard
deviation of the expectational component is lower than the standard deviation of the term premium,
the slope estimate is thus strongly biased downward (far below unity, as shown in the right panel of
Table 6). In the threshold framework this result is inverted. In each regime the variability of the
term premium, as measured by its standard deviation, is much lower than the variability of the

24 The covariance between the theoretical spread and the term premium is negative. At short maturities (n =12, 6) the
covariance is close to zero, but still negative. The covariance between long and short term rates is positive. The
covariance is a negative function of the distance between maturities (
n - m). The variance of short term yields is
generally larger than the variance of long term yields.

24



More intriguing information

1. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM
2. The Integration Order of Vector Autoregressive Processes
3. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax
4. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
5. The name is absent
6. The Tangible Contribution of R&D Spending Foreign-Owned Plants to a Host Region: a Plant Level Study of the Irish Manufacturing Sector (1980-1996)
7. From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience. Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli
8. The name is absent
9. Three Policies to Improve Productivity Growth in Canada
10. fMRI Investigation of Cortical and Subcortical Networks in the Learning of Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences
11. The name is absent
12. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
13. On the job rotation problem
14. The name is absent
15. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
16. The name is absent
17. Errors in recorded security prices and the turn-of-the year effect
18. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
19. PACKAGING: A KEY ELEMENT IN ADDED VALUE
20. AN EXPLORATION OF THE NEED FOR AND COST OF SELECTED TRADE FACILITATION MEASURES IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WTO NEGOTIATIONS