c(ε)
(л +
-Vi/fi (⅛)
∑j . s-~r⅛ffj(<Ы
7~ιΛa + ∣e) 1[i+v(е)]’ vε
7 - 1 ∖ 1 - 7/
(38)
with V(ε) being defined in equation (20). The latter follows from f (e⅛)/-
V = fι(ɛie)/ — Vi — sι + sii ^i∙ This proves the first part of equation (21).
Now we we prove the second part of equation (21). Substitute f z(⅛) / f (⅛)
in equation (31) from (33) and multiply the equation by — (Λi + eiε/(1 - 7))∙
This yields
7 - 2 de-ι
7 - 1 dε
λ + '■ "/0 - 7) d⅛ = c(ε) (λ, + -ɪ
dei∣dε dε- у 1 - 7
∀ i, ε∙
(39)
The factor of d2ei/de2 equals the inverse first term in equation (36). Hence
it follows from equation (36) and (15) that this factor equals
fi (eis')
(40)
-V
Insert (40) in (39) and obtain after aggregation across investors since
∑i d2ei/de2 = 0,
7—2 + Σ -4τd2e√dε2 = c(ε) fA + γ-e^^ ( ∀ ε (41)
7- 1 t ^) V 1 - 7 J
44
More intriguing information
1. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study2. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis
7. The Economic Value of Basin Protection to Improve the Quality and Reliability of Potable Water Supply: Some Evidence from Ecuador
8. Multi-Agent System Interaction in Integrated SCM
9. Infrastructure Investment in Network Industries: The Role of Incentive Regulation and Regulatory Independence
10. The name is absent