Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World



This proves the second part of equation (21). The proof of proposition 9
is the same for
7 = -∞.

Appendix H: Proof of Proposition 10

For a HARA-based risk function with 1 > 7 > -∞ the FOC (11) resp.

(14) yields

7-1

% ⅛ 1 + Si];  V i,ε,


(42)


or

. e,∙^              ,          .                            ,, i_ . .                                               . ,

A + -----= (—% K — 1 + si ])7^1; V i,ε-           (43)

1 7

Aggregating across investors yields A + eε /(1 7). Dividing the aggregate
equation by
Ai + eiε∕(1 — 7) yields 1∕g and hence,

1/9ie


=∑(

3 x


1 + Si] 1

1 + s3'] /


(44)


so that

d(1∕gig) = ^  1   / —% λ 1-7 / - — 1 + Si 1-7 1    Sj — si        )

ʌl 7 ~ljJ πε 1 + sJ     K 1 + s3)2 π ε'

(45)

Assume 7 < 1 and s⅛sj Vi. Then πz(ε) < 0 implies d(1∕g⅛ε)∕dε < 0 so
that
dg∕dε > 0.

45



More intriguing information

1. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
2. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School
3. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
4. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS
5. Announcement effects of convertible bond loans versus warrant-bond loans: An empirical analysis for the Dutch market
6. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
7. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
8. Education and Development: The Issues and the Evidence
9. What should educational research do, and how should it do it? A response to “Will a clinical approach make educational research more relevant to practice” by Jacquelien Bulterman-Bos
10. The name is absent