This proves the second part of equation (21). The proof of proposition 9
is the same for 7 = -∞.
Appendix H: Proof of Proposition 10
For a HARA-based risk function with 1 > 7 > -∞ the FOC (11) resp.
(14) yields
7-1
—% ⅛ — 1 + Si]; V i,ε,
(42)
or
. e,∙^ , . ,, i_ . . . ,
A + -----= (—% K — 1 + si ])7^1; V i,ε- (43)
1 — 7
Aggregating across investors yields A + eε /(1 — 7). Dividing the aggregate
equation by Ai + eiε∕(1 — 7) yields 1∕giε and hence,
1/9ie
=∑(
3 x
1 + Si] ∖ 1-τ
1 + s3'] /
(44)
so that
d(1∕gig) = ^ 1 / —% λ 1-7 / - — 1 + Si ∖ 1-7 1 Sj — si )
dε ʌl — 7 ∖~l∣jJ ∖πε — 1 + sJ K — 1 + s3)2 π ε'
(45)
Assume 7 < 1 and s⅛ ≤ sj Vi. Then πz(ε) < 0 implies d(1∕g⅛ε)∕dε < 0 so
that dghε∕dε > 0.
45
More intriguing information
1. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices2. The name is absent
3. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
4. The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning
5. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3
6. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
7. The Impact of Minimum Wages on Wage Inequality and Employment in the Formal and Informal Sector in Costa Rica
8. The name is absent
9. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry
10. The name is absent