This proves the second part of equation (21). The proof of proposition 9
is the same for 7 = -∞.
Appendix H: Proof of Proposition 10
For a HARA-based risk function with 1 > 7 > -∞ the FOC (11) resp.
(14) yields
7-1
—% ⅛ — 1 + Si]; V i,ε,
(42)
or
. e,∙^ , . ,, i_ . . . ,
A + -----= (—% K — 1 + si ])7^1; V i,ε- (43)
1 — 7
Aggregating across investors yields A + eε /(1 — 7). Dividing the aggregate
equation by Ai + eiε∕(1 — 7) yields 1∕giε and hence,
1/9ie
=∑(
3 x
1 + Si] ∖ 1-τ
1 + s3'] /
(44)
so that
d(1∕gig) = ^ 1 / —% λ 1-7 / - — 1 + Si ∖ 1-7 1 Sj — si )
dε ʌl — 7 ∖~l∣jJ ∖πε — 1 + sJ K — 1 + s3)2 π ε'
(45)
Assume 7 < 1 and s⅛ ≤ sj Vi. Then πz(ε) < 0 implies d(1∕g⅛ε)∕dε < 0 so
that dghε∕dε > 0.
45
More intriguing information
1. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update2. The name is absent
3. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
4. Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence
5. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
6. Perfect Regular Equilibrium
7. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?
8. Placentophagia in Nonpregnant Nulliparous Mice: A Genetic Investigation1
9. Estimating the Economic Value of Specific Characteristics Associated with Angus Bulls Sold at Auction
10. The name is absent