The name is absent



PEDRO PABLO ALVAREZ LOIS

with

(2.3)


The variable Vjχ determines the critical value of the productivity parameter
Vj,t for which the unconstrained demand equals the supply constraint l},t. The
term (Fj.t∕Pt)-6 appearing in the demand function of a firm with excess capacities
represents, at given >'t, the positive spillover effects a firm with idle resources
benefits from. As mentioned above, for tractability purposes I shall assume that all
intermediate firms are
ex-ante equal. This symmetry means that input prices and
capacities are the same across firms. Assuming that a law of large numbers applies
in the present context, the final output supply can be expressed as follows
(2.4)

yt


or taking into account equation (2.2),

(2.5)


yt



/ t>dF (t>) + lt e


Recall that F(t>) is the distribution function of idiosyncratic shocks; thus, for a pro-
portion F(v) of intermediate firms, the realized value of the productivity parameter
is below
v. Some manipulation of the previous expression allows one to write rela-
tive prices as a function of ¾, the proportion of firms with excess capacities

1

Z                                    .-.               λ e-1

.    .                    Ptt t t . . .       ≤≡L Γ I . .

(2.6)            -ɪ = < / t>dF (t>) + υt e / v≈dF(v)? -

Pt [√v                 Jvt          J

The right hand side of this expression is increasing in υ and bounded above by
1. To see this, first notice that the marginal productivity of a supply-constrained
input,
∂yt∕∂Yj,t, remains larger that its marginal cost, Pj.t, while they are equal
for unconstrained inputs. Thus, in the case that some input is supply-constrained,
one obtains that

f1 8Vt           f1

(2.7)                   yt = J,              > Jo Pj,tYj,t.dj

where the first equality is achieved by applying the Euler Theorem. The price of
the final good is equal to the shadow price index for intermediate inputs, which is
computed by using the marginal productivities of inputs in the production of final
output, that is,
where the price-index expression is obtained from the maximization problem of
the final-good firm. Notice that when no supply constraints are binding,
υ -÷v,
the model shrinks to the standard case and
∂yt∕∂Yj,t = Pj,t- In such a case, the
symmetric equilibrium relative price of an intermediate good with respect to the
final good,
PjxJYt, is equal to one. Moreover, under these circumstances, the




More intriguing information

1. Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and Labor Market Outcomes
2. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
3. Insecure Property Rights and Growth: The Roles of Appropriation Costs, Wealth Effects, and Heterogeneity
4. The name is absent
5. Multimedia as a Cognitive Tool
6. Stable Distributions
7. Publication of Foreign Exchange Statistics by the Central Bank of Chile
8. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10
9. Knowledge and Learning in Complex Urban Renewal Projects; Towards a Process Design
10. The name is absent
11. ISO 9000 -- A MARKETING TOOL FOR U.S. AGRIBUSINESS
12. Income Taxation when Markets are Incomplete
13. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
14. PACKAGING: A KEY ELEMENT IN ADDED VALUE
15. The name is absent
16. Campanile Orchestra
17. sycnoιogιcaι spaces
18. Errors in recorded security prices and the turn-of-the year effect
19. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
20. The name is absent