The name is absent



PEDRO PABLO ALVAREZ LOIS

a symmetric equilibrium in prices, avoiding in this manner price aggregation dif-
ficulties. It is worthwhile to point out that this assumption on the price behavior
of input firms should not have important implications on the manner in which the
economy responds to aggregate shocks: since prices are announced at the time
shocks are known, they are perfectly flexible in this sense.

The price decision is static and the same rule will be followed by all firms given
that,
ex-ante, all of them are identical; that is, Pt = Pjd- Consequently, each firm
chooses a price in order to maximize current period expected profits,

(2.13)            Pt ≡ arg max Eυ [PtYfit -(1 + ⅛ ) WtLdjd]

which by (2.12) is
(2.14)
where
Yjd is the level of inputs-goods produced by firm j. The particular amount of
those input-goods produced will depend on the demand shock faced by each firm.
Such a demand is derived from expression (2.2) or more specifically

Pt ≡ arg max Ev

(1 + O∏q∖

Λ¾ j't


.   . hPΛ fvt . .    - Γ

(2.15)         Ev(Yjd) = 51 Yt vdF(v) + Yt dF (t>)

1f√ √v             Jvt

Taking into account these considerations, the optimal price decision can be charac-
terized by the following result:

Lemma 2 (Intermediate-Goods Pricing). The price decision of any input firm j
at date t adopts the following expression:

(2.16)


Ft = fl _ 1 A ^1 (1 + ⅞) W*
t ∖    eπ (¾) J      AtXfi

where π (¾) represents the probability of excess capacity in the economy, that is,
π (¾) is a weight measure of the proportion of firms for which demand is smaller
than their productive capacity,

(2.17)


7Γ(¾)


Ev (Yt)


Vt

vdF(v)


Notice that π (v) depends only on v, as becomes clear from the combination of
equations (2.15) and (2.3) above,

Γ «dF (t>)
(2.18)                π ¾ =       ⅛-------=------

fvt t>dF (v) + vt f.v dF (v)

The pricing mechanism resulting from (2.16) implies that intermediate firms set
their price as a mark-up over the marginal cost.11 The mark-up rate depends
negatively on the (absolute) value of the price elasticity of expected sales, which
is defined as the elasticity of expected sales to expected demand, π
(v), times the
price elasticity of expected demand, e. This means that when
π (v), the probability
of a sales constraint, is large, that is, when more input firms are Iikelely to produce

11The derivation of this condition supposes that each monopolistic firm only considers the
direct effect of its price decision on demand and neglects all indirect effects (e.g. the effects
through
yt). This approximation is reasonable in a context where there is a continuum of firms.



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
4. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS
5. Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress
6. The name is absent
7. Strategic Policy Options to Improve Irrigation Water Allocation Efficiency: Analysis on Egypt and Morocco
8. Return Predictability and Stock Market Crashes in a Simple Rational Expectations Model
9. Dementia Care Mapping and Patient-Centred Care in Australian residential homes: An economic evaluation of the CARE Study, CHERE Working Paper 2008/4
10. The name is absent