A Appendix.
Proof of Proposition 2.3. 1 We know that if 1 + Rt = R(wt) then Yts
F(Kd,AtLd) and AKt d = k(wt). The competitive wage, wtc, implies:
At Lt
Ktd = Kts and Ltd = Nt, (33)
and, then, wtc satisfies:
Ks
■ = ANY 3,.
Substituting ( 2) and ( 6) in ( 34), and solving the equation for wtc we obtain:
Ss
Wtc = (1 - α)(At)1-α['.. ]α.
If wt > wtc we obtain:
7/ ʌ
k (wt) =
Ktd
AtLd
Kts
> . t,r
AtNt
St-1
AtNt ’
(35)
because k(wt) is increasing in wt. If Kd = St-ι, then, from ( 35), we obtain:
1-α
d d κd At~α^ -t_ 1 d
Ld = . ■-1—- = -------t— < Nt. If, on the contrary, Ld = Nt, then, from
t Atk(wt) [ wt ]— t , ,, t t, , J
[ 1 — α ]
( 35), we have: Ktd = kk(wt)At Nt > Kts .
If wt < wtc we have:
k (wt)
Kd K = St-A
AtLd AtNt AtNt ■
(36)
If Ld = Nt, then, from ( 36), we have: Kd = k(wt)AtNt = [ɪwt-] — —N—— < Kt.
1 α At —
d t d Kd
If, on the. contrary, Kt = St-ι, then, from ( 36), we obtain: Ld = - t^ > > Nt.
Proof of Proposition 3.1. 1 First note that the wage set by the union will
never be lower than the competitive wage. From proposition 2.3.1, if wt < wtc
then Lte = Nt . Thus setting the wage equal to the competitive wage we still have
Lte = Nt and a greater wage. Now we solve the program of the union assuming
A ɪ -s
that Le = -------t-1. It is easy to show that the wt that maximizes the program
t [ιwtα]α
of the union is the wage that maximizes the function:
_1
(37)
St = ((1 - τt)wt - ht)wt α ;
where ht = γt(1-τt-1)wt-1+(1-γt)st. The first order condition for a maximum
of St is:
1 (1 - τt )wt - ht
(1 - τt) - “ ʌ-----W ----t = 0. (38)
Solving ( 38) for wt we obtain:
ht = Yt(1 - τt-1)wt-1 + (1 - Yt)st (39)
(1 - α)(1 - τt) (1 - α)(1 - τt)
18
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)
3. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence
4. The name is absent
5. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
6. The name is absent
7. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
8. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
9. The name is absent
10. HACCP AND MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION