Hence, σ(Q,v) ≤ σ(Q,v,). Suppose σ(Q,v) = σ(Q,v,). Then, all agents in the path from
v′ to v form part of a cycle at this step. Since an agent can be part of at most one cycle
at a given step, all agents in the path from v, to v are in the same cycle. ■
Lemma B.7 Let Q ∈ QI. Let i ∈ I and Qti ∈ Q. Define Q := (Qi,Q-i). Suppose
τ(Q)(i) = τ(Q')(i) and σ(Q,i) ≤ σ(Q,,i). Then, for each step l with σ(Q,i) ≤ l ≤
σ(Q,,i), if v ∈ V(Q,,l)∖(P(Q',l,i) ∪ i) then v ∈ V(Q,l) and F(Q,l,v) = F(Q,,l,v).28
Proof Let p := σ(Q, i) and p, := σ(Q', i). From Lemma B.3(b),
V(Q,p) = V(Q,,p) and qQ,p = qQ',p for each school s ∈ V(Q,p) ∩ S. (1)
With a slight abuse of notation, for each l, p ≤ l ≤ p, denote Pl = P(Q,, l, i) ∪ i. From
Observation B.1,
Pp ⊆ Pp+1 ⊆∙∙∙⊆ Pp'-1 ⊆ Pp'. (2)
Also note
V(Q,,p,) ⊆ V(Q',p' - 1) ⊆∙∙∙⊆ V(Q,p + 1) ⊆ V(Q,p). (3)
We are done if we prove the following Claim(l) for each l, p ≤ l ≤ p′.
Claim(l): If v ∈ V(Q,, l)\Pl, then v ∈ V(Q, l) and e(Q, l, v) = e(Q,, l, v).
Indeed, Claim(l) immediately implies the following Consequence(l):
Consequence(l): Ifv ∈ V (Q,, l)\Pl, then v ∈ V(Q,l) and F(Q,l,v) = F (Q,, l, v).
We now prove by induction that Claim(l) is true for each l, p ≤ l ≤ p,. By Lemma B.3(b,c),
V(Q, p) = V(Q,, p) and e(Q, p, v) = e(Q,, p, v) for each agent v ∈ V(Q, p)\i. Hence,
Claim(p) is true.
If p, = p we are done. So, suppose p, = p. Let l be a step such that p < l ≤ p,.
Assume Claim(g) is true for all g, p ≤ g < l ≤ p,. We prove that Claim(l) is true. Let
v ∈ V(Q,, l)\Pl. From (2) and (3), v ∈ V(Q,, g)\Pg for each step g, p ≤ g < l. From
Consequence(g) (p ≤ g < l), v ∈ V(Q, g) and
F(Q, g, v) = F(Q,, g, v) for each step g, p ≤ g < l. (4)
Since v ∈ V (Q,, l), v is not removed at the end of step l - 1 in TTC(Q,). Then by (1)
and (4), v is also not removed at the end of step l - 1 in TTC(Q). Hence, v ∈ V(Q, l).
28It follows immediately from the proof that the directed paths associated with F(Q, l, v) and F(Q', l, v)
in V(Q, l) and V(Q', l), respectively, also coincide.
36
More intriguing information
1. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e32. The name is absent
3. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
4. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
5. Motivations, Values and Emotions: Three Sides of the same Coin
6. FASTER TRAINING IN NONLINEAR ICA USING MISEP
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
10. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?