Hence, σ(Q,v) ≤ σ(Q,v,). Suppose σ(Q,v) = σ(Q,v,). Then, all agents in the path from
v′ to v form part of a cycle at this step. Since an agent can be part of at most one cycle
at a given step, all agents in the path from v, to v are in the same cycle. ■
Lemma B.7 Let Q ∈ QI. Let i ∈ I and Qti ∈ Q. Define Q := (Qi,Q-i). Suppose
τ(Q)(i) = τ(Q')(i) and σ(Q,i) ≤ σ(Q,,i). Then, for each step l with σ(Q,i) ≤ l ≤
σ(Q,,i), if v ∈ V(Q,,l)∖(P(Q',l,i) ∪ i) then v ∈ V(Q,l) and F(Q,l,v) = F(Q,,l,v).28
Proof Let p := σ(Q, i) and p, := σ(Q', i). From Lemma B.3(b),
V(Q,p) = V(Q,,p) and qQ,p = qQ',p for each school s ∈ V(Q,p) ∩ S. (1)
With a slight abuse of notation, for each l, p ≤ l ≤ p, denote Pl = P(Q,, l, i) ∪ i. From
Observation B.1,
Pp ⊆ Pp+1 ⊆∙∙∙⊆ Pp'-1 ⊆ Pp'. (2)
Also note
V(Q,,p,) ⊆ V(Q',p' - 1) ⊆∙∙∙⊆ V(Q,p + 1) ⊆ V(Q,p). (3)
We are done if we prove the following Claim(l) for each l, p ≤ l ≤ p′.
Claim(l): If v ∈ V(Q,, l)\Pl, then v ∈ V(Q, l) and e(Q, l, v) = e(Q,, l, v).
Indeed, Claim(l) immediately implies the following Consequence(l):
Consequence(l): Ifv ∈ V (Q,, l)\Pl, then v ∈ V(Q,l) and F(Q,l,v) = F (Q,, l, v).
We now prove by induction that Claim(l) is true for each l, p ≤ l ≤ p,. By Lemma B.3(b,c),
V(Q, p) = V(Q,, p) and e(Q, p, v) = e(Q,, p, v) for each agent v ∈ V(Q, p)\i. Hence,
Claim(p) is true.
If p, = p we are done. So, suppose p, = p. Let l be a step such that p < l ≤ p,.
Assume Claim(g) is true for all g, p ≤ g < l ≤ p,. We prove that Claim(l) is true. Let
v ∈ V(Q,, l)\Pl. From (2) and (3), v ∈ V(Q,, g)\Pg for each step g, p ≤ g < l. From
Consequence(g) (p ≤ g < l), v ∈ V(Q, g) and
F(Q, g, v) = F(Q,, g, v) for each step g, p ≤ g < l. (4)
Since v ∈ V (Q,, l), v is not removed at the end of step l - 1 in TTC(Q,). Then by (1)
and (4), v is also not removed at the end of step l - 1 in TTC(Q). Hence, v ∈ V(Q, l).
28It follows immediately from the proof that the directed paths associated with F(Q, l, v) and F(Q', l, v)
in V(Q, l) and V(Q', l), respectively, also coincide.
36
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Economies of Size for Conventional Tillage and No-till Wheat Production
3. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
4. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Ein pragmatisierter Kalkul des naturlichen Schlieβens nebst Metatheorie
8. Økonomisk teorihistorie - Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast?
9. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
10. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole