Constrained School Choice



Remark 7.4 implies that f admits a weak X-cycle. So, suppose μI PE(P). Since
γ (Q)
PE(P ), γ(Q) = μI. Since |S (P )| = 1, γ (Q) S (P ). By Theorem 6.5, f admits
an Ergin-cycle, which by Remark 7.4 implies again that f admits a weak X -cycle.

(iii) (i): Suppose that f admits a weak X -cycle. By (ii) (i) there exists P with
|S (P )| ≥ 2. So, there exists μ S (P )\PE (P ). By Lemma A.8, there exists Q Eγ (P, k)
with γ(Q) = μ.

(i) (iv): Let P be a school choice problem with Q Eβ(P, k) such that β(Q) / PE(P).
By Theorem 6.1, β(Q)
S (P ). Hence, by Lemma A.8, there exists Q Eγ (P, 1) with
Y(Q?) = β(Q). Hence, from (i)
(iii) it follows that f admits a weak X-cycle.

(iv) (i): Suppose that f admits a weak X -cycle. From (iii) (i) it follows that
there is a school choice problem P with Q
Eγ(P, 1) such that γ(Q) / PE(P). Since
Γ
β(P, 1) = Γγ(P, 1), the result follows.                                                    

B Appendix: Proofs for TTC

We first introduce some graph-theoretic notation to provide concise proofs of our results.
Let Q
QI. Suppose the TTC algorithm is applied to Q, which we will denote by
TT C(Q), and suppose it terminates in no less than l steps. We denote by G(Q, l) the
(directed) graph that corresponds to step l. In this graph, the set of vertices V (Q, l) is
the set of agents present in step l. For any v
V (Q, l) there is a (unique) directed edge
in G(Q, l) from v to some v
V (Q, l) (possibly v = v if v I) if agent v points to agent
v
, which will also be denoted by e(Q, l, v) = v.

A path (from v1 to vp) in G(Q, l) is an ordered list of agents (v1, v2 , . . . , vp) such that
v
r V (Q, l) for all r = 1, . . . , p and each vr points to vr+1 for all r = 1, . . . , p - 1. A
self-cycle (i) of a student i is a degenerate path,
i.e., i points to himself in G(Q, l). An
agent v
V (Q, l) is a follower of an agent v V (Q, l) if there is a path from v to v
in G(Q, l). The set of followers of v is denoted by F(Q, l, v). An agent v V (Q, l) is a
predecessor of an agent v
V (Q, l) if there is a path from v to v in G(Q, l). The set of
predecessors of v is denoted by P(Q, l, v). A cycle in G(Q, l) is a path (v
1, v2, . . . , vp) such
that also v
p points to v1. Note that a self-cycle is a special case of a cycle. With a slight
abuse of notation we sometimes refer to a cycle as the corresponding non ordered set of
involved agents. Finally, for v
I S, let σ(Q, v) denote the step of the TTC algorithm
at which agent v is removed.

33



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY
4. The name is absent
5. The Integration Order of Vector Autoregressive Processes
6. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax
11. Perfect Regular Equilibrium
12. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
13. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
14. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
15. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement
16. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
17. The name is absent
18. The Economic Value of Basin Protection to Improve the Quality and Reliability of Potable Water Supply: Some Evidence from Ecuador
19. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
20. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden