^^^“Strong
----Weak
-----RNNE (S)
.....RNNE (W)
-----RANE (S)
.....RANE (W)
Figure 1: Average Bid Functions (all rounds)
Table 6 reports the average RSDs and the test results of a comparison to the Nash equilibrium
predictions we considered. The deviations from the RNNE and RANE predictions are
relatively small, between 4% and 17% of the maximum possible deviations. However, those
from RANE are significantly smaller than those from RNNE for both Strong and Weak
bidders only in the symmetric treatment. In the asymmetric treatments, with the exception of
Strong bidders in MIX for whom the RNNE model outperforms the RANE one, the two
models perform equally well in explaining deviations. Deviations from RANE are also
significantly smaller in the symmetric treatment than in the asymmetric ones. As these
16
More intriguing information
1. The Formation of Wenzhou Footwear Clusters: How Were the Entry Barriers Overcome?2. Optimal Vehicle Size, Haulage Length, and the Structure of Transport Costs
3. The name is absent
4. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers
5. Chebyshev polynomial approximation to approximate partial differential equations
6. Structural Influences on Participation Rates: A Canada-U.S. Comparison
7. El Mercosur y la integración económica global
8. A Rational Analysis of Alternating Search and Reflection Strategies in Problem Solving
9. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
10. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers