Has Competition in the Japanese Banking Sector Improved?

Table 4. Results of simultaneous estimation of eqs. (7), (8), and (9):

regional banks_______________________________________
Parameter ________________________________________________E	MVR Estimate	P-value	3SLS Estimate	P-value
θ 1974	0.624	[.000]	0.380	[.000]
θ 1975	0.511	[.000]	0.274	[.000]
θ 1976	0.473	[.000]	0.226	[.000]
θ 1977	0.365	[.000]	0.137	[.000]
θ 1978	0.407	[.000]	0.165	[.000]
θ 1979	0.487	[.000]	0.261	[.000]
θ 1980	0.389	[.000]	0.247	[.000]
θ 1981	0.264	[.000]	0.135	[.000]
θ 1982	0.334	[.000]	0.200	[.000]
θ 1983	0.323	[.000]	0.193	[.000]
θ 1984	0.239	[.000]	0.142	[.000]
θ 1985	0.242	[.000]	0.160	[.000]
θ 1986	0.259	[.000]	0.187	[.000]
θ 1987	0.180	[.000]	0.148	[.000]
θ 1988	0.337	[.000]	0.307	[.000]
θ 1989	0.365	[.000]	0.335	[.000]
θ 1990	0.282	[.000]	0.283	[.000]
θ 1991	0.337	[.000]	0.314	[.000]
θ 1992	0.338	[.000]	0.304	[.000]
θ 1993	0.274	[.000]	0.246	[.000]
θ 1994	0.392	[.000]	0.376	[.000]
θ 1995	0.285	[.000]	0.316	[.000]
θ 1996	0.391	[.000]	0.413	[.000]
θ 1997	0.381	[.000]	0.417	[.000]
θ 1998	0.563	[.000]	0.555	[.000]
θ 1999	0.693	[.000]	0.698	[.000]
θ 2000	0.720	[.000]	0.722	[.000]
a 0	9.637	[.000]	9.635	[.000]
a 1	0.178	[.000]	0.575	[.000]
a 2	0.316	[.000]	0.837	[.000]
a 3	0.698	[.000]	0.288	[.000]
a 4	0.146	[.102]	0.807	[.000]
^a 5	-0.263	[.000]	-0.239	[.000]
a 6	-0.393	[.000]	-0.140	[.358]
^a 7	0.226	[.000]	-0.672	[.000]
a 8	-0.251	[.004]	-0.809	[.000]
a 9	-0.180	[.007]	0.525	[.001]
b0	3.331	[.000]	3.448	[.000]
b2	0.360	[.000]	0.356	[.000]
b3	-0.005	[.000]	-0.006	[.000]
b4	0.353	[.000]	0.318	[.000]
b5	-0.019	[.454]	-0.071	[.008]
1∕η 1974	0.428	[.000]	0.430	[.000]
1∕η 1975-76	0.427	[.000]	0.428	[.000]
1∕η 1977-78	0.436	[.000]	0.437	[.000]
1∕η 1979-80	0.429	[.000]	0.431	[.000]
1∕η 1981-82	0.424	[.000]	0.425	[.000]
1∕η 1983-84	0.425	[.000]	0.427	[.000]
1∕η 1985-86	0.427	[.000]	0.428	[.000]
1∕η 1987-88	0.433	[.000]	0.435	[.000]
1∕η 1989-90	0.421	[.000]	0.423	[.000]
1∕η 1991-92	0.417	[.000]	0.420	[.000]
1∕η1993-94	0.434	[.000]	0.437	[.000]
1∕η 1995-96	0.453	[.000]	0.455	[.000]
1∕η 1997-98	0.461	[.000]	0.463	[.000]
1∕η 1999-00	0.466	[.000]	0.468	[.000]
R² ' for (7)	0.980		0.975
R² for (8)	0.964		0.966
R² for (9)__________	0.939		0.939

More intriguing information

1. Detecting Multiple Breaks in Financial Market Volatility Dynamics
2. The name is absent
3. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
4. Rural-Urban Economic Disparities among China’s Elderly
5. LOCAL CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE
6. SegmentaciÃ³n en la era de la globalizaciÃ³n: Â¿CÃ³mo encontrar un segmento nuevo de mercado?
7. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
8. The name is absent
9. Are Public Investment Efficient in Creating Capital Stocks in Developing Countries?
10. Feature type effects in semantic memory: An event related potentials study