Has Competition in the Japanese Banking Sector Improved?

Table 4. Results of simultaneous estimation of eqs. (7), (8), and (9):

regional banks_______________________________________
Parameter ________________________________________________E	MVR Estimate	P-value	3SLS Estimate	P-value
θ 1974	0.624	[.000]	0.380	[.000]
θ 1975	0.511	[.000]	0.274	[.000]
θ 1976	0.473	[.000]	0.226	[.000]
θ 1977	0.365	[.000]	0.137	[.000]
θ 1978	0.407	[.000]	0.165	[.000]
θ 1979	0.487	[.000]	0.261	[.000]
θ 1980	0.389	[.000]	0.247	[.000]
θ 1981	0.264	[.000]	0.135	[.000]
θ 1982	0.334	[.000]	0.200	[.000]
θ 1983	0.323	[.000]	0.193	[.000]
θ 1984	0.239	[.000]	0.142	[.000]
θ 1985	0.242	[.000]	0.160	[.000]
θ 1986	0.259	[.000]	0.187	[.000]
θ 1987	0.180	[.000]	0.148	[.000]
θ 1988	0.337	[.000]	0.307	[.000]
θ 1989	0.365	[.000]	0.335	[.000]
θ 1990	0.282	[.000]	0.283	[.000]
θ 1991	0.337	[.000]	0.314	[.000]
θ 1992	0.338	[.000]	0.304	[.000]
θ 1993	0.274	[.000]	0.246	[.000]
θ 1994	0.392	[.000]	0.376	[.000]
θ 1995	0.285	[.000]	0.316	[.000]
θ 1996	0.391	[.000]	0.413	[.000]
θ 1997	0.381	[.000]	0.417	[.000]
θ 1998	0.563	[.000]	0.555	[.000]
θ 1999	0.693	[.000]	0.698	[.000]
θ 2000	0.720	[.000]	0.722	[.000]
a 0	9.637	[.000]	9.635	[.000]
a 1	0.178	[.000]	0.575	[.000]
a 2	0.316	[.000]	0.837	[.000]
a 3	0.698	[.000]	0.288	[.000]
a 4	0.146	[.102]	0.807	[.000]
^a 5	-0.263	[.000]	-0.239	[.000]
a 6	-0.393	[.000]	-0.140	[.358]
^a 7	0.226	[.000]	-0.672	[.000]
a 8	-0.251	[.004]	-0.809	[.000]
a 9	-0.180	[.007]	0.525	[.001]
b0	3.331	[.000]	3.448	[.000]
b2	0.360	[.000]	0.356	[.000]
b3	-0.005	[.000]	-0.006	[.000]
b4	0.353	[.000]	0.318	[.000]
b5	-0.019	[.454]	-0.071	[.008]
1∕η 1974	0.428	[.000]	0.430	[.000]
1∕η 1975-76	0.427	[.000]	0.428	[.000]
1∕η 1977-78	0.436	[.000]	0.437	[.000]
1∕η 1979-80	0.429	[.000]	0.431	[.000]
1∕η 1981-82	0.424	[.000]	0.425	[.000]
1∕η 1983-84	0.425	[.000]	0.427	[.000]
1∕η 1985-86	0.427	[.000]	0.428	[.000]
1∕η 1987-88	0.433	[.000]	0.435	[.000]
1∕η 1989-90	0.421	[.000]	0.423	[.000]
1∕η 1991-92	0.417	[.000]	0.420	[.000]
1∕η1993-94	0.434	[.000]	0.437	[.000]
1∕η 1995-96	0.453	[.000]	0.455	[.000]
1∕η 1997-98	0.461	[.000]	0.463	[.000]
1∕η 1999-00	0.466	[.000]	0.468	[.000]
R² ' for (7)	0.980		0.975
R² for (8)	0.964		0.966
R² for (9)__________	0.939		0.939

More intriguing information

1. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
2. BODY LANGUAGE IS OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE IN LARGE GROUPS
3. Improvements in medical care and technology and reductions in traffic-related fatalities in Great Britain
4. Intertemporal Risk Management Decisions of Farmers under Preference, Market, and Policy Dynamics
5. Ronald Patterson, Violinist; Brooks Smith, Pianist
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. A Hybrid Neural Network and Virtual Reality System for Spatial Language Processing
10. Wettbewerbs- und Industriepolitik - EU-Integration als Dritter Weg?