Conflict and Uncertainty: A Dynamic Approach



αt1+1 = (1 - δ1 (st1) ) αt1 + xtzt

αt2+1 = (1 - δ2 (st2)) αt2 + xt2zt2

δ (s1 ) = δ1 + α1 (/- - 1) + b1 (/- - s1)2
st-1      /         st-1        /

δ (s2) = δ2 + α2 (- 1) + b2 (■/- - 1)2
st-1      /         st-1      /

This is a standard dynamic model. If we assume rational expectations we can use any solution
method proposed by the macroeconomic theory to solve this model.

5.2 Solving a rational expectations dynamic model

The equilibrium in this conflict is in correspondence with a highly non-linear system of dynamic
stochastic equations, which cannot easily be solved. A linear approximation around the non-
stochastic steady state is used. The method consists in linearizing each first order and/or equilibrium
condition around the steady state by a simple first order application of Taylor’s Theorem. A linear
system is obtained, with transformed variables of the form Ut =
ut - u, where u is the steady state
value of variable ut.

The linear system of differential equations is solved by the method explained by Schmitt-Grohe
and Uribe (2004). A general description of the methodology can be found in Heer and Maussner
(2005). The solution is given by the
H, M and R matrices that generate the dynamic solution by
the iteration of the equations:

ut = Hst

st+1  = Mst+Rεt+1

where u is the vector of forward-looking variables (controls, со-states, flow variables), s is the
vector of endogenous and exogenous backward-looking state variables, H characterizes the optimal
policy function,
M is the state transition matrix, ε is the innovation vector and R specifies how the
exogenous shocks (innovations) affect the dynamic system.

Note that the uniqueness of the solution can be assured for the stable case. Henceforth a solution
to our conflict model a la macroeconomic theory needs to be, at a first instance, a stable solution.

The stable solution rules out, by definition, the chaotic behaviour of the endogenous variables9.
But even with this strong constraint we can obtain several conclusions about the dynamic of the
9If the model is stable, eventually the endogenous variables return to the steady state. We could then predict the
future value of the variables, and therefore they would not be chaotic.

16



More intriguing information

1. Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)
2. The Cost of Food Safety Technologies in the Meat and Poultry Industries.
3. The name is absent
4. Design and investigation of scalable multicast recursive protocols for wired and wireless ad hoc networks
5. The magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions
6. Better policy analysis with better data. Constructing a Social Accounting Matrix from the European System of National Accounts.
7. Globalization, Redistribution, and the Composition of Public Education Expenditures
8. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
9. Une nouvelle vision de l'économie (The knowledge society: a new approach of the economy)
10. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development