The name is absent



10

Endnotes

1 Useful input on the survey instrument was obtained from Ted Schroeder, John Lawrence, Steve Koontz,
and Dillon
Feuz.

2 Surveys were mailed to members of three associations by their staff; for the fourth, surveys were mailed
directly from Oklahoma State University to association members.

Table 1. Selected frequency distributions from survey respondents using grid pricing in 2003

Number of

Responses

Percent of
Total

Respondents by state where majority of cattle were fed

Nebraska

42

36.5

Colorado

15

13.0

Kansas

32

27.8

Texas

20

17.4

Oklahoma, New Mexico, other

7

6.1

Respondents by size based on number of cattle marketed

Less than 5,000 head

25

21.6

5,000-19,999

35

30.2

20,000-49,999

22

19.0

50,000-99,999

22

19.0

100,000 or more

12

10.3

Respondents by extent of marketings priced with a grid

1-20 percent

48

41.4

21-40

21

18.1

41-60

5

4.3

61-80

17

14.7

81-100

25

21.6



More intriguing information

1. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003
2. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics
3. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?
4. The name is absent
5. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
6. EU Preferential Partners in Search of New Policy Strategies for Agriculture: The Case of Citrus Sector in Trinidad and Tobago
7. The name is absent
8. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis
9. The name is absent
10. Økonomisk teorihistorie - Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast?