The name is absent



10

Endnotes

1 Useful input on the survey instrument was obtained from Ted Schroeder, John Lawrence, Steve Koontz,
and Dillon
Feuz.

2 Surveys were mailed to members of three associations by their staff; for the fourth, surveys were mailed
directly from Oklahoma State University to association members.

Table 1. Selected frequency distributions from survey respondents using grid pricing in 2003

Number of

Responses

Percent of
Total

Respondents by state where majority of cattle were fed

Nebraska

42

36.5

Colorado

15

13.0

Kansas

32

27.8

Texas

20

17.4

Oklahoma, New Mexico, other

7

6.1

Respondents by size based on number of cattle marketed

Less than 5,000 head

25

21.6

5,000-19,999

35

30.2

20,000-49,999

22

19.0

50,000-99,999

22

19.0

100,000 or more

12

10.3

Respondents by extent of marketings priced with a grid

1-20 percent

48

41.4

21-40

21

18.1

41-60

5

4.3

61-80

17

14.7

81-100

25

21.6



More intriguing information

1. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
2. Tissue Tracking Imaging for Identifying the Origin of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias: A New Role of Cardiac Ultrasound in Electrophysiology
3. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
4. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region
5. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities
6. Education Responses to Climate Change and Quality: Two Parts of the Same Agenda?
7. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
8. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
9. The Functions of Postpartum Depression
10. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union