The name is absent



12

Table 3. Mean rating of factors affecting whether or not to use grid pricing, by extent of grid pricing
in 2003 (NE, CO, KS, TX, OK, NM)

Grid Pricing Groups

50% or less of More than 50% of

Factor______________________________________________________Marketings___________Marketings

(Mean response)

Price and Market Conditions

Favorable base price

3.20

3.67

Upward trending market

4.44

4.36

Tight supplies (fewer days of feed)

5.20

5.07

Wide Choice-Select price spread

3.61

3.07

Wide YG4-YG5 price spread

4.96

4.50

Cattle Characteristics

Quality grade well (percent Choice or better)

2.76

2.86

Yield grade well (percent YG1-2)

3.53

3.05

Dress well (high dressing percent)

3.43

2.88

Cattle expected to fit a specific grid

3.13

2.71

Futures Market Conditions

Relatively stable prices*

3.89

4.43

Relatively stable, predictable basis

4.21

4.69

Other Factors

Favorable expected profit margins

4.14

4.12

Marketing with an agreement, contract

4.00

3.56

or through an alliance or cooperative

Favorable recent experience with

3.38

2.93

grid pricing

* Different means at 0.10 significance, with equal variances



More intriguing information

1. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts
2. Implementation of the Ordinal Shapley Value for a three-agent economy
3. Cardiac Arrhythmia and Geomagnetic Activity
4. BODY LANGUAGE IS OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE IN LARGE GROUPS
5. Program Semantics and Classical Logic
6. The name is absent
7. Ronald Patterson, Violinist; Brooks Smith, Pianist
8. The name is absent
9. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
10. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation