11
Table 2. Fed cattle marketing and pricing practices, by extent of grid pricing in 2003 (NE, CO, KS,
TX, OK, NM)
Grid Pricing Groups
Practice 50% or less of More than 50%
Marketings of Marketings
(Percent) | ||
Percent custom fed |
60.8 |
52.5 |
Percent sold to largest buyer* |
56.5 |
83.6 |
Percent marketed with an agreement, | ||
contract, part of an alliance or cooperative** |
16.8 |
61.2 |
Percent priced on a ... | ||
Live weight basis** |
46.7 |
10.2 |
Dressed weight basis** |
34.7 |
5.2 |
Grid* |
18.4 |
84.0 |
Percent of grid pricing when the base price is . | ||
Negotiated*** |
39.9 |
23.5 |
Formula tied to quoted prices |
42.2 |
39.1 |
Formula tied to plant average**** |
14.3 |
29.6 |
Formula tied to boxed beef |
_________________1.4_______________ |
5.5 |
* Different means at 0.01 significance, with equal variances
** Different means at 0.01 significance, with unequal variances
*** Different means at 0.05 significance, with equal variances
**** Different means at 0.05 significance, with unequal variances
More intriguing information
1. Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa2. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
3. AN IMPROVED 2D OPTICAL FLOW SENSOR FOR MOTION SEGMENTATION
4. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
5. THE ECONOMICS OF COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE- THE IRISH CASE STUDY.
6. The name is absent
7. The Variable-Rate Decision for Multiple Inputs with Multiple Management Zones
8. Ability grouping in the secondary school: attitudes of teachers of practically based subjects
9. Segmentación en la era de la globalización: ¿Cómo encontrar un segmento nuevo de mercado?
10. The name is absent