11
Table 2. Fed cattle marketing and pricing practices, by extent of grid pricing in 2003 (NE, CO, KS,
TX, OK, NM)
Grid Pricing Groups
Practice 50% or less of More than 50%
Marketings of Marketings
|
(Percent) | ||
|
Percent custom fed |
60.8 |
52.5 |
|
Percent sold to largest buyer* |
56.5 |
83.6 |
|
Percent marketed with an agreement, | ||
|
contract, part of an alliance or cooperative** |
16.8 |
61.2 |
|
Percent priced on a ... | ||
|
Live weight basis** |
46.7 |
10.2 |
|
Dressed weight basis** |
34.7 |
5.2 |
|
Grid* |
18.4 |
84.0 |
|
Percent of grid pricing when the base price is . | ||
|
Negotiated*** |
39.9 |
23.5 |
|
Formula tied to quoted prices |
42.2 |
39.1 |
|
Formula tied to plant average**** |
14.3 |
29.6 |
|
Formula tied to boxed beef |
_________________1.4_______________ |
5.5 |
* Different means at 0.01 significance, with equal variances
** Different means at 0.01 significance, with unequal variances
*** Different means at 0.05 significance, with equal variances
**** Different means at 0.05 significance, with unequal variances
More intriguing information
1. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)2. What Contribution Can Residential Field Courses Make to the Education of 11-14 Year-olds?
3. The name is absent
4. AJAE Appendix: Willingness to Pay Versus Expected Consumption Value in Vickrey Auctions for New Experience Goods
5. Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in Models with Endogenous Fertility
6. Nonparametric cointegration analysis
7. Output Effects of Agri-environmental Programs of the EU
8. Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?
9. Linking Indigenous Social Capital to a Global Economy
10. The name is absent