13
Table 4. Regression results for factors affecting the extent of grid pricing by survey respondents in
2003
|
Independent Variable |
Coefficient |
|
Intercept |
-15.790 *** (1.91) |
|
Percent sold to largest buyer |
0.674 *** (6.02) |
|
Percent marketed with an agreement contract, part of an alliance or cooperative |
0.366 *** (5.42) |
|
Disagreement with "Tight supplies (fewer days on feeder)" |
-7.676 (1.62) |
|
Agreement with "Favorable profit margins" |
-10.765 ** (2.16) |
|
Agreement with "Wide Choice-Select price spread" |
11.488 ** |
|
Disagreement with "Wide YG4-YG5 price spread" |
-9.762 ** |
|
Agreement with "Dress well (high dressing percentage)" |
8.883 * (1.95) |
|
Disagreement with "Relatively stable futures market prices" |
14.336 *** (2.92) |
|
n |
110 |
|
Adjusted R2 |
0.596___________ |
Numbers in parentheses are absolute values of calculated t statistics; *=0.10, **=0.05, and ***=0.01
significance level.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Voting by Committees under Constraints
4. The name is absent
5. ASSESSMENT OF MARKET RISK IN HOG PRODUCTION USING VALUE-AT-RISK AND EXTREME VALUE THEORY
6. The Shepherd Sinfonia
7. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
8. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update
9. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
10. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR