APPENDIX TABLE A2. Distribution of Peanut
Production, Southern Region, 1978
APPENDIX TABLE A5. Distribution of Cotton
Production, Southern Region, 1978
Income |
Appalachian |
Delta |
Southeast |
Southern |
Total | |||||
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- | |
Less cban |
3.4 |
0.1 |
53.2 |
2.5 |
--- Percent----- 6.1 0.1 |
3.7 |
0.2 |
6.0 |
__ | |
$2,500-19,999 |
45.8 |
5.7 |
32.7 |
3.5 |
30.3 |
5.3 |
38.9 |
9.6 |
35.0 |
6.0 |
$20,000-39,999 |
18.4 |
9.0 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
18.0 |
8.6 |
20.4 |
13.7 |
18.0 |
9.0 |
$40,000-99,999 |
26.7 |
26.2 |
3.2 |
6.3 |
25.0 |
25.2 |
24.7 |
34.4 |
25.0 |
27.0 |
$100,000 and |
5.7 |
59.0 |
8.9 |
85.8 |
20.6 |
60.8 |
12.3 |
42.1 |
16.0 |
58.0 |
Income |
Appalachian |
Delta |
Southeast |
Southern |
Total | |||||
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- | |
-----ret ceι∣L —- | ||||||||||
l⅛ss .than |
6.9 |
0.2 |
5.1 |
0.1 |
4.9 |
0.1 |
3.4 |
0.1 |
4.0 |
— |
$2,500-19,999 |
32.9 |
6.5 |
28.1 |
2.7 |
29.3 |
3.7 |
27.7 |
5.3 |
28.0 |
4.0 |
$20,000-39,999 |
14.2 |
6.2 |
13.0 |
3.5 |
14.6 |
5.4 |
22.2 |
11.2 |
19.0 |
8.0 |
$40,000-99,999 |
20.7 |
18.3 |
20.5 |
12.6 |
21.1 |
17.0 |
28.4 |
30.3 |
25.0 |
23.0 |
$100,000 and |
1.6 |
31.2 |
33.3 |
81.1 |
30.1 |
73.8 |
18.3 |
53.1 |
24.0 |
65.0 |
Source: Calculated from 1978 Census of Agriculture,
Bureau of the Census.
Source: Calculated from 1978 Census of Agriculture,
Bureau of the Census.
APPENDIX TABLE A3. Distribution of Corn
Production, Southern Region, 1978
APPENDIX TABLE A6. Distribution of Rice
Production, Southern Region, 1978
Appalachian |
Delta |
Southeast |
Southern |
Total | ||||||
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- | |
— |
—- Percent----- |
— |
— | |||||||
Less than | ||||||||||
$2,500 |
17.4 |
1.9 |
52.7 |
15.2 |
31.8 |
0.3 |
18.3 |
0.4 |
2.4 |
2.0 |
$2,500-19,999 |
46.6 |
17.1 |
34.5 |
24.0 |
40.2 |
4.5.3 |
38.6 |
3.5 |
44.0 |
14.0 |
$20,000-39,999 |
14.6 |
14.0 |
4.0 |
8.3 |
11.6 |
11.0 |
9.9 |
3.8 |
13.0 |
11.0 |
$40,000-99,999 |
13.7 |
26.3 |
4.3 |
13.7 |
14.0 |
22.3 |
15.0 |
17.2 |
13.0 |
23.0 |
$100,000 and | ||||||||||
over |
7.7 |
40.7 |
4.5 |
38.8 |
2.4 |
51.1 |
18.2 |
75.1 |
6.0 |
50.0 |
Income |
Appalachian |
Delta |
Southeast |
Southern |
Total | ||||
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms pro^ |
.Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
---Frd^ | |
Less than |
__ |
__ |
0.9 |
0.1 |
—— Percent----- |
0.3 |
__ |
1.0 |
__ |
$2,500-19,999 |
— |
— |
12.5 |
1.9 |
— — |
6.8 |
0.7 |
12.0 |
2.0 |
$20,000-39,999 |
— |
— |
12.1 |
4.3 |
__ __ |
8.4 |
1.8 |
12.0 |
4.0 |
$40,000-99,999 |
— |
— |
28.8 |
19.3 |
— __ |
25.6 |
11.8 |
28.0 |
17.0 |
$100,000 and |
- |
-- |
45.7 |
74.4 |
- - |
58.9 |
85.7 |
47.0 |
77.0 |
Source: Calculated from 1978 Census of Agriculture,
Bureau of the Census.
Source: Calculated from 1978 Census of Agriculture,
Bureau of the Census.
APPENDIX TABLE A4. Distribution of Soy-
bean Production, Southern Region, 1978
Appalachian |
Delta |
Southeast |
Southern |
Total | |||||
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
— Pro- ' Farms , , |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
TP de- | |
________duction | |||||||||
Less than |
10.2 |
1.0 |
9.6 |
0 1 |
-— Percent—— 13.5 1.1 |
5.7 |
0.1 |
11.0 |
1.0 |
$2,500-19,999 |
43.1 |
15.4 |
34.7 |
6.0 |
40.9 13.9 |
31.2 |
8.0 |
40.0 |
10.0 |
$20,000-39,999 |
17.1 |
13.6 |
14.1 |
7.4 |
14.2 11.9 |
17.0 |
8.8 |
16.0 |
10.0 |
$40,000-99,999 |
18.5 |
27.0 |
19.1 |
19.8 |
17.0 25.0 |
22.9 |
21.7 |
18.0 |
23.0 |
$100,000 and |
11.1 |
43.0 |
22.5 |
66.7 |
14.4 48.1 |
23.2 |
61.4 |
15.0 |
56.0 |
Source: |
Calculated from |
1978 Census of Agriculture, | |||||||
Bureau of the Census. |
APPENDIX TABLE A7. Distribution of To-
bacco Production, Southern Region, 1978
Income |
Appalachian |
Delta |
Southeast |
Southern Pla ins_ |
Total | ||||
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
Farms |
Pro- |
_ Pro- _______duction |
Farms |
Pro- | |
Less than |
19.6 |
2.8 |
__ |
__ |
---Percent---- 5.2 0.1 |
— |
19.0 |
2.0 | |
$2,500-19,999 |
56.1 |
26.8 |
— |
— |
32.7 |
7.4 |
__ __ |
55.0 |
24.0 |
$20,000-39,999 |
12.2 |
18.7 |
— |
— |
19.8 |
11.6 |
— — |
13.0 |
18.0 |
$40,000-99,999 |
5.9 |
26.7 |
__ |
— |
25.1 |
30.9 |
__ — |
7.0 |
27.0 |
$100,000 and |
6.2 |
25.0 |
— |
__ |
17.2 |
50.0 |
__ __ |
6.0 |
29.0 |
Source: Calculated from 1978 Census of Agriculture,
Bureau of the Census.
REFERENCES
Bishop, C. E. “Special Problems and Policy Needs of Southern Agriculture.” Second Annual Farm
Policy Review Conference, Raleigh, NC, 1961, pp. 212-30.
Penn, J. B. “The Changing Farm Sector and Future Public Policy: An Economic Perspective.” in
Agricultural-Food Policy Review: Perspectives for the 1980’s, AFPR-4, Economics and Statis-
tics Service, U.S. Dept, of Agriculture, 1981, pp. 28-58.
U.S. Dept, of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Problems and Prospects for U.S. Agriculture.
Washington, D.C., December 1981.
Rudd, Robert W. “A Look at Major Events Impacting Productivity and Uncertainty in Southern
Agriculture During the 1970’s. 5. J. Agr. Econ. 2(1979):1-6.
37
More intriguing information
1. Volunteering and the Strategic Value of Ignorance2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The Impact of Financial Openness on Economic Integration: Evidence from the Europe and the Cis
5. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
6. Outline of a new approach to the nature of mind
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Evidence on the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Three European Regions