ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENT REGRESSION MODELS FOR APPLIED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH



Table 3. Parameter estimates, standard error estimates, and statistical significance of parameters of normal

and non-normal error regression models for corn and soybean prices.

_____OLS

______AR(1)_____

SUR-AR(I)

NSUR-AR(I)

NNSUR-AR(I)

Par. Est.

S.E. Est.

Par. Est.

S.E. Est.

Par. Est.

S.E. Est. Par. Est.

S.E. Est. Par. Est. S.E. Est.

θc

0.9446 0.2875**

μ c

— —

Bco

3.0840

0.1423**

3.0860

0.2263**

3.0817**

0.2273

3.1351

0.1600**

3.1722 0.1065**

Bc1

-1.5611

1.3432ns

-1.4552

2.1317ns

-1.4237ns

2.1879

-2.1217

0.5563**

-2.3509 0.3929**

Bc2

-1.0001

2.6509ns

-1.3787

4.1937ns

-1.4244ns

4.3186

— —

σc

0.3490

0.2811

0.2818**

0.0282

0.2821

0.0282**

0.2990 0.0804**

pc

0.5460

0.1185**

0.5347**

0.1111

0.5353

0.1112**

0.5688 0.0987**

θs

0.5677 0.1600**

μ s

15.7161 5.0376**

Bso

5.2544

0.3246**

5.3045

0.4998**

5.2899

0.4291**

5.3262

0.4172**

5.3607 0.3347**

Bs1

11.8443

3.0636**

11.5373

4.7101**

11.6223

4.0533**

11.1429

3.8273**

10.1967 2.8094**

Bs2

-25.4146

6.0462**

-25.0758

9.2701**

-25.1588 7.9850**

-24.1720

7.4968**

-21.4259 5.3032**

σs__

0.7960

0.6587

0.6645

0.0677**

0.6645

0.0677**

0.7369 0.1603**

ps__

0.5132

0.1214**

0.4066 0.1227**

0.4073

0.1232**

0.4484 0.0763**

pcs

0.3598 0.1310**

0.3597

0.1311**

0.4644 0.1158**

MVCLF

33.86

MVCLF

36.98 ]

MVCLF

36.92

MVCLF 52.54

R2

R2c=0.44

R2s=0.28

R2c=0.61 R2s=0.48

R2c=0.61 R2s=0.47 R2c=0.61 R2s=0.47

R2c=0.61R2s=0.47

Notes: MVCLF stands for the maximum value reached by the concentrated log-likelihood function. Par.
Est. and S.E. Est. refer to the parameter and standard error estimates, respectively. The parameter and
standard error estimates corresponding to B
ci and Bsi, and to Bc2 and Bs2 have been divided by 100 and
10000, respectively. * and ** denote statistical significance and the 90 and 95% level, respectively,
according to two-tailed t tests. The R
2’s are calculated by dividing the regression sums of squares (based on
the autocorrelated {AR(1)} predictions) by the total sums of squares, i.e. it are the square of the correlation
coefficients between the AR(1) predictions and the observed corn (c) and soybean (s) prices.

26



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. A Regional Core, Adjacent, Periphery Model for National Economic Geography Analysis
3. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
4. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
5. The name is absent
6. Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care
7. REVITALIZING FAMILY FARM AGRICULTURE
8. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN TENNESSEE ON WATER USE AND CONTROL - AGRICULTURAL PHASES
9. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
10. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
11. Clinical Teaching and OSCE in Pediatrics
12. LABOR POLICY AND THE OVER-ALL ECONOMY
13. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
14. The purpose of this paper is to report on the 2008 inaugural Equal Opportunities Conference held at the University of East Anglia, Norwich
15. Giant intra-abdominal hydatid cysts with multivisceral locations
16. Visual Artists Between Cultural Demand and Economic Subsistence. Empirical Findings From Berlin.
17. The name is absent
18. A Study of Adult 'Non-Singers' In Newfoundland
19. PROJECTED COSTS FOR SELECTED LOUISIANA VEGETABLE CROPS - 1997 SEASON
20. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?