CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS



foods might be benefited from the labeling policy. If consumers are willing to bear the premium
for non-GM foods, producers do not need to fully absorb the cost of segmenting the market.
From the government standpoint, labeling of GM foods might cause a warfare loss to the society
in the long run if the market is not competitive for both GM and non-GM food products.
Consumers would pay a higher price in order to avoid GM foods and the market does not reach
to the optimal equilibrium for product prices. The warfare loss in the long term might discourage
the government to enforce a mandatory labeling policy regarding GM foods. Therefore, it is
crucial to educate the general public about the characteristics of GM foods so that the risk
perception associated from consuming such foods can be mitigated.

18



More intriguing information

1. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
2. The name is absent
3. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
4. EU enlargement and environmental policy
5. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
6. The name is absent
7. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
8. The name is absent
9. Measuring and Testing Advertising-Induced Rotation in the Demand Curve
10. Experience, Innovation and Productivity - Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown