CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS



foods might be benefited from the labeling policy. If consumers are willing to bear the premium
for non-GM foods, producers do not need to fully absorb the cost of segmenting the market.
From the government standpoint, labeling of GM foods might cause a warfare loss to the society
in the long run if the market is not competitive for both GM and non-GM food products.
Consumers would pay a higher price in order to avoid GM foods and the market does not reach
to the optimal equilibrium for product prices. The warfare loss in the long term might discourage
the government to enforce a mandatory labeling policy regarding GM foods. Therefore, it is
crucial to educate the general public about the characteristics of GM foods so that the risk
perception associated from consuming such foods can be mitigated.

18



More intriguing information

1. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
2. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness
3. Importing Feminist Criticism
4. The name is absent
5. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
6. Evidence of coevolution in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
7. Artificial neural networks as models of stimulus control*
8. Measuring and Testing Advertising-Induced Rotation in the Demand Curve
9. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE
10. Outline of a new approach to the nature of mind
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. NATURAL RESOURCE SUPPLY CONSTRAINTS AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: A COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH
14. Insurance within the firm
15. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
16. Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa
17. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers