CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS



International Food Information Council Foundation (IFIC). (2001). “More U.S. Consumers See
Potential Benefits to Food Biotechnology.” Wirthlin Group Quorum Surveys, January
2001.
http://www.ific.org/proactive/newsroom/release.vtml?id=19241 (March).

Loader, R. and Henson, S. (1998). “A View of GMOs From the UK”. AgBioForum, 1 (1), 31-34.

Loehman, Edna and VoHu De. (1982). “Application of Stochastic Choice Modeling to Policy
Analysis of Public Goods: A Case Study of Air Quality Improvements.”
Review of
Economics and Statistics,
54 (1982):474-480

Macer, D. and Ng A.C. (2000). “Changing Attitudes to Biotechnology in Japan”. Nature
Biotechnology,
18, 945-947.

Nordic Industrial Fund. (2000). Negative Attitude to Gene-Modified Food.
http://www.nordicinnovation.net (November 1).

Wang, Q., Halbrendt, C., Kolodinsky, J. and Schmidt, F. (1997). “Willingness to Pay for rBST-
Free Milk: A Two-Limit Tobit Model Analysis”.
Applied Economics Letters, 4, 619-621.

20



More intriguing information

1. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
2. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
3. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
4. INTERACTION EFFECTS OF PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR U.S. COTTON
5. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
6. Wounds and reinscriptions: schools, sexualities and performative subjects
7. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices
8. Education and Development: The Issues and the Evidence
9. Delayed Manifestation of T ransurethral Syndrome as a Complication of T ransurethral Prostatic Resection
10. Group cooperation, inclusion and disaffected pupils: some responses to informal learning in the music classroom