The name is absent



Stata Technical Bulletin

11


Examples

The first example is from the originators of this statistic (Berry and Mielke 1994):
. ioV Iikert

Variable IOV          IOC            p-value

---------+------------------------------------

Iikert I 0.6976       0.3024         0.0440

Next we use the same data, except that we have duplicated the above variable and then set all cases with a value of 5 to missing:

. replace lik2 = . if lik2==5
(4 real changes made, 4 to missing)

. iov lik*, actual

Variable

IOV

IOC

p-value

rows

Iikert

I 0.6976

0.3024

0.0440

ε

lik2

I 0.8116

0.1884

0.0000

4

Next is a made-up example. There are two variables and 40 observations in the dataset. Variable x consists of just the
numbers 1-40, while variable y has 10 each of the values 1, 2, 3, and 4. I start with a brief description of the two variables:

. SU X y

Variable

I      Obs

Mean

Std. Dev.

Min

Max

x

У

I         40

I         40

20.ε

2.ε

11.69046

1.132277

1

1

40

4

. iov x,

rows(40)

Variable

IOV

IOC

p-value

x

I 0.6833

0.3167

0.9364

• Iov y,

rows(4)

Variable

IOV

IOC

p-value

У

I 0.8333

0.1667

0.0000

Note the odd result for these two variables when the rows option is not used; the р-value is not affected, but the values of the
statistics are

. iov x y

Variable

IOV

IOC

p-value

x

I 0.0260

0.9750

0.9364

У

I 0.6260

0.3750

0.0000

The Neyman-Barton smooth goodness-of-fit test

The syntax of nbgof is


nbgof varname [if exp] [in range]

This program performs a Neyman-Barton smooth goodness-of-fit test of order 2. The test result is asymptotically distributed as
chi-squared with 2 df. This is used for testing of uniformity (i.e., a uniform distribution). The test is valid for (7(0,1), so if the
data are outside this range they are transformed to inside the range using a standard transformation (Stephens 1986).

The output consists of four pieces of information for each variable: (1) the value of the test statistic; (2) its p-value; (3) the
value of
U, one of the two components of the test statistic and also a test statistic; (4) the value of S2, the other component
of the test statistic, and also a test statistic. р-values are not given for
U and S2 as I have been unable to find a reasonable
approximation to the tables given in Stephens. (Each of these is asymptotically standard normal.) The Neyman-Barton test is
equal to the sum of the squared values of the component tests.

The data are expected to be in unweighted form. If they are frequency weighted, use Stata’s expand command.

No options are allowed.



More intriguing information

1. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach
2. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON VIRGINIA DAIRY FARMS
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Applications of Evolutionary Economic Geography
6. The name is absent
7. The Composition of Government Spending and the Real Exchange Rate
8. Multi-Agent System Interaction in Integrated SCM
9. An Incentive System for Salmonella Control in the Pork Supply Chain
10. Monetary Policy News and Exchange Rate Responses: Do Only Surprises Matter?
11. Skills, Partnerships and Tenancy in Sri Lankan Rice Farms
12. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
13. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
14. INTERACTION EFFECTS OF PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR U.S. COTTON
15. Declining Discount Rates: Evidence from the UK
16. Experience, Innovation and Productivity - Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown
17. The name is absent
18. Epistemology and conceptual resources for the development of learning technologies
19. Managing Human Resources in Higher Education: The Implications of a Diversifying Workforce
20. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?